green
Positive treatment
8.7 score
Treatment trajectory · 1986 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1986
2006
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 37 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Bradley
(2×)
also: Cited "see, e.g."
Accord United States v. Murphy, 768 F.2d 1518, 1535-36 (7th Cir.1985), cert. denied, 475 U.S. 1012 , 106 S.Ct. 1188 , 89 L.Ed.2d 304 (1986); United States v. Jenkins, 442 F.2d 429, 438 (5th Cir.1971); cf. Wright v. Smith, 569 F.2d 1188, 1190-91 (2d Cir.1978) (off-the-record bench conference in state proceedings). .
discussed
Cited "see"
Martino v. First National Bank of Harvey (In Re Garofalo's Finer Foods, Inc.)
See United States v. Murphy, 768 F.2d 1518, 1539 (7th Cir.1985), cert. denied 475 U.S. 1012 , 106 S.Ct. 1188 , 89 L.Ed.2d 304 (1986); Union Carbide Corp. v. U.S. Cutting Serv., Inc., 782 F.2d 710 , 716-17 (7th Cir.1986); Dele sdernier v. Porterie, 666 F.2d 116, 120-23 (5th Cir.), cert. denied 459 U.S. 839 , 103 S.Ct. 86 , 74 L.Ed.2d 81 (1982) (where the court rejected the decision in SCA Services on its merits); see also Schurz Communications, Inc. v. F.C.C., 982 F.2d 1057, 1060 (7th Cir.1992) (Posner, J.) (characterizing SCA Services as “weak precedent” since it did not cite United States…
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Adam Stillo, Sr. And Joseph T. Stillo
See United States v. Murphy, 768 F.2d 1518, 1531 (7th Cir.1985), certiorari denied, 475 U.S. 1012 , 106 S.Ct. 1188 , 89 L.Ed.2d 304 .
discussed
Cited "see"
Siskind v. Sperry Retirement Program, Unisys
See Chambless v. Masters, Mates & Pilots Pension Plan, 772 F.2d 1032, 1040 (2d Cir.1985) (amendment which reduced retiree’s benefits arbitrary and capricious because not in interests of plan participants and beneficiaries), cert. denied, 475 U.S. 1012 , 106 S.Ct. 1189 , 89 L.Ed.2d 304 (1986); Agro v. Joint Plumbing Indus.
discussed
Cited "see"
Siskind v. The Sperry Retirement Program
See Chambless v. Masters, Mates & Pilots Pension Plan, 772 F.2d 1032, 1040 (2d Cir.1985) (amendment which reduced retiree's benefits arbitrary and capricious because not in interests of plan participants and beneficiaries), cert. denied, 475 U.S. 1012 , 106 S.Ct. 1189 , 89 L.Ed.2d 304 (1986); Agro v. Joint Plumbing Indus.
discussed
Cited "see"
El Fenix De Puerto Rico v. the M/Y Johanny
See United States v. Murphy, 768 F.2d 1518, 1541 (7th Cir.1985) (pre-Liljeberg ease under § 455(a), holding that an “appearance of impropriety is not enough to poison the prior acts ” of recused judge) (emphasis added), cert. denied, 475 U.S. 1012 , 106 S.Ct. 1188 , 89 L.Ed.2d 304 (1986).
cited
Cited "see"
Maltby v. Winston
See United States v. Murphy, 768 F.2d 1518, 1536 (7th Cir.1985), cert. denied, 475 U.S. 1012 , 106 S.Ct. 1188 , 89 L.Ed.2d 304 (1986).
cited
Cited "see"
Maltby v. Winston
See United States v. Murphy, 768 F.2d 1518, 1536 (7th Cir.1985), cert. denied, 475 U.S. 1012 , 106 S.Ct. 1188 , 89 L.Ed.2d 304 (1986).
discussed
Cited "see"
Snyder v. Elliot W. Dann Co., Inc.
See Lee v. Burkhart, 991 F.2d 1004, 1009 (2d Cir.1993) (citing Chambless v. Masters, Mates & Pilots Pension Plan, 772 F.2d 1032, 1041 (2d Cir.1985), cert. denied, 475 U.S. 1012 , 106 S.Ct. 1189 , 89 L.Ed.2d 304 (1986)); Gridley v. Cleveland Pneumatic Co., 924 F.2d 1310, 1318-19 (3d Cir.), cert. denied, 501 U.S. 1232 , 111 S.Ct. 2856 , 115 L.Ed.2d 1023 (1991); see also Donnelly v. Bank of New York Co., 801 F.Supp. 1247, 1253 (S.D.N.Y.1992) (“courts are ‘reluctant to apply the estoppel doctrine to require the payment of pension funds’ because ‘[t]he actuarial soundness of pension funds i…
cited
Cited "see"
Iwans v. Aetna Life Ins. Corp.
See Lee, 991 F.2d at 1009 (citing Chambless v. Masters, Mates & Pilots Pension Plan, 772 F.2d 1032, 1039 (2d Cir.1985), cert. denied, 475 U.S. 1012 , 106 S.Ct. 1189 , 89 L.Ed.2d 304 (1986)).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. David J. Shields and Pasquale F. Deleo
See United States v. Murphy, 768 F.2d 1518, 1530 (7th Cir.1985), certiorari denied, 475 U.S. 1012 , 106 S.Ct. 1188 , 89 L.Ed.2d 304 .
discussed
Cited "see"
Earl Lee and David Abramson v. Richard Burkhart and Patrick Sullivan, Connecticut General Life Insurance Company
(2×)
See Chambless v. Masters, Mates & Pilots Pension Plan, 772 F.2d 1032, 1039 (2d Cir.1985), cert. denied, 475 U.S. 1012 , 106 S.Ct. 1189 , 89 L.Ed.2d 304 (1986).
cited
Cited "see"
Indiana Waste Systems, Inc. v. County of Porter
See Fromm v. Rosewell, 771 F.2d 1089, 1091-92 (7th Cir. 1985), cert. denied, 475 U.S. 1012 , 106 S.Ct. 1188 , 89 L.Ed.2d 304 (1986).
cited
Cited "see"
Seff v. National Organization of Industrial Trade Unions Insurance Trust Fund
See Chambless v. Masters, Mates & Pilots Pension Plan, 772 F.2d 1032, 1041 (2d Cir.1985), ce rt. denied, 475 U.S. 1012 , 106 S.Ct. 1189 , 89 L.Ed.2d 304 (1986).
cited
Cited "see"
First City National Bank & Trust Co. v. Federal Deposit Insurance
See United States v. Murphy, 768 F.2d 1518, 1529-30 (7th Cir.), cert. denied, 475 U.S. 1012 , 106 S.Ct. 1188 , 89 L.Ed.2d 304 (1986); See also New York v. Joseph L.
discussed
Cited "see"
Parker v. Connors Steel Company
See United States v. Murphy, 768 F.2d 1518 (7th Cir.1985), cert. denied, 475 U.S. 1012 , 106 S.Ct. 1188 , 89 L.Ed.2d 304 (1986) The statutory standard puts to the judge a question about the objective state of the legal and lay culture.
cited
Cited "see"
Parker v. Connors Steel Co.
See United States v. Murphy, 768 F.2d 1518 (7th Cir.1985), cert. denied, 475 U.S. 1012 , 106 S.Ct. 1188 , 89 L.Ed.2d 304 (1986).
discussed
Cited "see"
Chambless v. Masters, Mates & Pilots Pension Plan
See Chambless v. Masters, Mates & Pilots Pension Plan, 602 F.Supp. 904 (S.D.N.Y.1984) (Carter, J.), aff'd, 772 F.2d 1032 (2d Cir.1985), cert. denied, 475 U.S. 1012 , 106 S.Ct. 1189 , 89 L.Ed.2d 304 (1986).
cited
Cited "see"
Liberty Lobby, Inc. v. Dow Jones & Company, Inc.
See United States v. Murphy, 768 F.2d 1518, 1539 (7th Cir. *1302 1985), cert. denied, 475 U.S. 1012 , 106 S.Ct. 1188 , 89 L.Ed.2d 304 (1986).
discussed
Cited "see"
Bennett v. Tucker
(2×)
See Fed.R.Civ.P. 21 6 The defendant argues that the Supreme Court's ruling in Nevada v. United States, 463 U.S. 110 , 103 S.Ct. 2906 , 77 L.Ed.2d 509 (1983), and our decision in Fromm v. Rosewell, 771 F.2d 1089 (7th Cir.1985), cert. denied, --- U.S. ----, 106 S.Ct. 1188 , 89 L.Ed.2d 304 (1986), preclude a plaintiff who has any alternate remedy from maintaining a claim under Logan.
discussed
Cited "see"
Mary Kate LEAMAN, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. OHIO DEPARTMENT OF MENTAL RETARDATION & DEVELOPMENT DISABILITIES, Et Al., Defendants-Appellees
(2×)
See United States v. Widgery, 778 F.2d 325, 328 (7th Cir.1985), and United States v. Murphy, 768 F.2d 1518, 1541 (7th Cir.1985), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 106 S.Ct. 1188 , 89 L.Ed.2d 304 (1986), which teach that such recusals are prospective only and do not invalidate prior judicial actions.
discussed
Cited "see"
Ferleger v. First American Mortgage Co.
See United States v. Murphy, 768 F.2d 1518, 1531 (7th Cir.1985) (the Circuit Court of Cook County was an enterprise that “affected commerce — in what it bought, in its effect on the lawyers and litigants who appeared before it”), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 106 S.Ct. 1188 , 89 L.Ed.2d 304 (1986).
discussed
Cited "see"
H.G. Gallimore, Inc. v. Abdula
(2×)
also: Cited "see, e.g."
See United States v. Murphy, 768 F.2d 1518, 1531 (7th Cir.1985) (Circuit Court of Cook County was an enterprise that “affected commerce — in what it bought, in its effect on the lawyers and litigants who appeared before it.”), cert. denied, — U.S.-, 106 S.Ct. 1188 , 89 L.Ed.2d 304 (1986); Bunker Ramo, 713 F.2d at 1289 . 3.
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Kenneth Anderson and John Marine
See United States v. Murphy, 768 F.2d 1518, 1535 (7th Cir.1985), cert. denied, — U.S.-, 106 S.Ct. 1188 , 89 L.Ed.2d 304 (1986) (evidence of bribes received on other occasions admissible to show common plan).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Bradley
The Government must prove that [the victims] reasonably believed they had no alternative to continue working other than imprisonment or worse." 4 Accord United States v. Murphy, 768 F.2d 1518, 1535-36 (7th Cir.1985), cert. denied, 475 U.S. 1012 , 106 S.Ct. 1188 , 89 L.Ed.2d 304 (1986); United States v. Jenkins, 442 F.2d 429, 438 (5th Cir.1971); cf. Wright v. Smith, 569 F.2d 1188, 1190-91 (2d Cir.1978) (off-the-record bench conference in state proceedings). 5 Some circuits are indulgent where an objection on the record cross-references what was said in an off-the-record charge conference, see U…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Salemme
See also United States v. Murphy, 768 F.2d 1518, 1540 (7th Cir.1985) (“Section 455(a) is concerned with perceptions rather than actual defects in the administration of justice.”), cert. denied, 475 U.S. 1012 , 106 S.Ct. 1188 , 89 L.Ed.2d 304 (1986).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Sherman v. State
The test for determining whether the judge's impartiality might reasonably be questioned is an objective test that assumes that "a reasonable person knows and understands all the relevant facts." In re Drexel Burnham Lambert Inc., 861 F.2d 1307 , 1313 (2d Cir.1988) (emphasis omitted), cert. denied, 490 U.S. 1102 , 109 S.Ct. 2458 , 104 L.Ed.2d 1012 (1989); see also United States v. Murphy, 768 F.2d 1518 , *379 1538 (7th Cir.1985), cert. denied, 475 U.S. 1012 , 106 S.Ct. 1188 , 89 L.Ed.2d 304 (1986).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Benny Lavern Collins
See also United States v. Farrell, 877 F.2d 870 (11th Cir.), cert. denied, 493 U.S. 922 , 110 S.Ct. 289 , 107 L.Ed.2d 268 (1989) (extortionate sum demanded from individuals so high that it "would have affected interstate commerce to a legally cognizable degree"), and United States v. Murphy, 768 F.2d 1518 (7th Cir.1985), cert. denied, 475 U.S. 1012 , 106 S.Ct. 1188 , 89 L.Ed.2d 304 (1986) (payment of bribes by lawyers depleted aggregate ability to purchase law books and office supplies that moved in interstate commerce) 22 United States v. Buffey, 899 F.2d 1402, 1404 (4th Cir.1990) 23 United S…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Collins
See also United States v. Farrell, 877 F.2d 870 (11th Cir.), cert. denied, 493 U.S. 922 , 110 S.Ct. 289 , 107 L.Ed.2d 268 (1989) (extortionate sum demanded from individuals so high that it "would have affected interstate commerce to a legally cognizable degree"), and United States v. Murphy, 768 F.2d 1518 (7th Cir.1985), ce rt. denied, 475 U.S. 1012 , 106 S.Ct. 1188 , 89 L.Ed.2d 304 (1986) (payment of bribes by lawyers depleted aggregate ability to purchase law books and office supplies that moved in interstate commerce). 22 .
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. James M. Eliason
See, e.g., United States v. Murphy, 768 F.2d 1518, 1532 (7th Cir.1985), cert. denied, 475 U.S. 1012 , 106 S.Ct. 1188 , 89 L.Ed.2d 304 (1986); United States v. Lyons, 670 F.2d 77, 80 (7th Cir.) (“[a]ny agreement [concerning immunity] made by the government must be scrupulously performed and kept”), cert. denied, 457 *1153 U.S. 1136, 102 S.Ct. 2965 , 73 L.Ed.2d 1354 (1982).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Marion S. Barry, Jr.
See, e.g., United States v. Murphy, 768 F.2d 1518, 1539-41 (7th Cir.1985), cert. denied, 475 U.S. 1012 , 106 S.Ct. 1188 , 89 L.Ed.2d 304 (1986); United States v. Slay, 714 F.2d 1093, 1094-95 (11th Cir.1983), cert. denied, 464 U.S. 1050 , 104 S.Ct. 729 , 79 L.Ed.2d 189 (1984); cf., Jenkins v. Sterlacci, 849 F.2d 627, 634-35 (D.C.Cir.1988) (holding that the defendant's participation, without objection, in the hearing before a special master constituted a waiver of his claim that the special master should have disqualified himself under Canon 3 C(l) of the Code of Judicial Conduct for United Stat…
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
C & F Packing Co. v. Doskocil Companies, Inc.
See also United States v. Murphy, 768 F.2d 1518, 1537 (7th Cir.1985), cert. denied, 475 U.S. 1012 , 106 S.Ct. 1188 , 89 L.Ed.2d 304 (1986).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Barksdale v. Emerick
See, e.g., United States v. Murphy, 768 F.2d 1518, 1538-39 (7th Cir.1985), cert. denied, 475 U.S. 1012 , 106 S.Ct. 1188 , 89 L.Ed.2d 304 (1986); Portasknick v. Port City Construction Co., 609 F.2d 1101 , 1114-15 (5th Cir.) (dicta), cert. denied, 449 U.S. 820 , 101 S.Ct. 78 , 66 L.Ed. 2d 22 (1980).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Barksdale v. Emerick
See, e.g., United States v. Murphy, 768 F.2d 1518, 1538-39 (7th Cir.1985), cert. denied, 475 U.S. 1012 , 106 S.Ct. 1188 , 89 L.Ed.2d 304 (1986); Portashnick v. Port City Construction Co., 609 F.2d 1101 , 1114-15 (5th Cir.) (dicta), cert. denied, 449 U.S. 820 , 101 S.Ct. 78 , 66 L.Ed.2d 22 (1980).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
William F. Deak, Cross-Appellants v. Masters, Mates and Pilots Pension Plan, Cross
See also Chambless v. Masters, Mates & Pilots Pension Plan, 772 F.2d 1032, 1041 (2d Cir.1985), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 106 S.Ct. 1189 , 89 L.Ed.2d 304 (1986) (interpreting a similar amendment to the MM & P Pension Plan).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Schwartz v. Newsweek, Inc.
Liability Under ERISA ERISA provides that “a fiduciary shall discharge duties with respect to a plan solely in the interest of the participants and beneficiaries and ... with the care, skill, prudence, and diligence under the circumstances then prevailing that a prudent man acting in a like capacity and familiar with such matters would use____” 29 U.S.C. § 1104 (a)(1)(B). “[A] court may intervene in the administration of an employee benefit plan, but should intervene only when the the trustees transgress their fiduciary duties by acting in an arbitrary *388 and capricious manner.” Mor…
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Fromm
v.
Rosewell, Treasurer of Cook County, Illinois
v.
Rosewell, Treasurer of Cook County, Illinois
No. 85-907.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Feb 24, 1986.
Published
C. A. 7th Cir. Certiorari denied.