green
Positive treatment
3.7 score
Treatment trajectory · 1987 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1987
2006
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 8 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited "see"
Schechter v. NJ DEPT. OF LAW
See In re Hotel & Restaurant Employees & Bartenders Int'l Union Local 54, 203 N.J.Super. 297, 317 , 496 A. 2d 1111 (App.Div.) (noting that "[o]f paramount concern to the Legislature [in enacting the Casino Control Act] was the exclusion from participation in the gaming industry of all persons with known criminal records, habits or associations."), certif. denied, 102 N.J. 352 , 508 A. 2d 223 (1985), cert. denied, 475 U.S. 1085 , 106 S.Ct. 1467 , 89 L.Ed. 2d 723 (1986); see also State of N.J., Dept. of Law & Public Safety, Div. of Gaming Enforcement v. Gonzalez, 142 N.J. 618, 628 , 667 A. 2d 68…
discussed
Cited "see"
Hull v. United States
See duPont v. Southern Nat’l Bank, 771 F.2d 874, 882-83 (5th Cir.1985) (distinguishing between guardian ad litem and attorney ad litem and holding that only expenses of guardian ad litem are taxable as costs), cert. denied, 475 U.S. 1085 , 106 S.Ct. 1467 , 89 L.Ed.2d 723 (1986); Franz v. Buder, 38 F.2d 605, 607 (8th Cir.1930) (“Where the services as guardian ad litem and as an attorney are rendered by the same person, a separate allowance should be made,for each service; the amount allowed for services as guardian ad litem being taxable as costs and the amount allowed for services as couns…
discussed
Cited "see"
Hull v. United States
See duPont v. Southern Nat'l Bank, 771 F.2d 874, 882-83 (5th Cir.1985) (distinguishing between guardian ad litem and attorney ad litem and holding that only expenses of guardian ad litem are taxable as costs), cert. denied, 475 U.S. 1085 , 106 S.Ct. 1467 , 89 L.Ed.2d 723 (1986); Franz v. Buder, 38 F.2d 605, 607 (8th Cir.1930) ("Where the services as guardian ad litem and as an attorney are rendered by the same person, a separate allowance should be made for each service; the amount allowed for services as guardian ad litem being taxable as costs and the amount allowed for services as counsel f…
discussed
Cited "see"
Osei-Afriyie v. Medical College of Pennsylvania
See App. at 64-65. 43 In DuPont v. Southern Nat'l Bank of Houston, Tex., 771 F.2d 874, 882 (5th Cir.1985) (quoting Richardson v. Tyson, 110 Wis. 572, 578 , 86 N.W. 250, 251 (1901)), cert. denied, 475 U.S. 1085 , 106 S.Ct. 1467 , 89 L.Ed.2d 723 (1986), the court wrote: 44 As one court explained, "[T]he infant is always the ward of every court wherein his rights or property are brought into jeopardy, and is entitled to the most jealous care that no injustice be done to him." 45 Since no competent party here had the incentive to draw the district court's attention to the fact that the children sh…
discussed
Cited "see"
E.F. Hutton Group, Inc. v. United States Postal Service
See duPont v. Southern National Bank, 771 F.2d 874, 881 (5th Cir.1985), cert. denied, 475 U.S. 1085 , 106 S.Ct. 1467 , 89 L.Ed.2d 723 (1986); Duval v. Midwest Auto City, 578 F.2d 721 , 724 (8th Cir.1978); Moore’s ¶41.13[1] at 41-167 & n. 16.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Collins on Behalf of Collins v. Tabet
(2×)
See also duPont v. Southern Nat'l Bank of Houston, Texas, 771 F.2d 874 (5th Cir.1985), cert. denied, 475 U.S. 1085 , 106 S.Ct. 1467 , 89 L.Ed.2d 723 (1986).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Snook v. Trust Co. of Georgia Bank of Savannah, N.A.
If the trustee is found to be without liability at the conclusion of the litigation, however, then he may obtain reimbursement, provided that he demonstrates to the satisfaction of the court hearing the case that the fees were “reasonably necessary and proper for the defense or protection of the trust estate.” Id.; see also DuPont v. Southern Nat’l Bank of Houston, Texas, 575 F.Supp. 849, 863 (S.D.Tex.1983) (reimbursement for trustee’s attorney’s fees appropriate when litigation did not result from fault of trustee and fees “constitute ‘a fair allowance for the professional work …
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Snook v. Trust Company of Georgia Bank of Savannah
If the trustee is found to be without liability at the conclusion of the litigation, however, then he may obtain reimbursement, provided that he demonstrates to the satisfaction of the court hearing the case that the fees were "reasonably necessary and proper for the defense or protection of the trust estate." Id.; see also DuPont v. Southern Nat'l Bank of Houston, Texas, 575 F.Supp. 849, 863 (S.D.Tex.1983) (reimbursement for trustee's attorney's fees appropriate when litigation did not result from fault of trustee and fees "constitute 'a fair allowance for the professional work necessary to b…
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Kowalski
v.
Kowalski
v.
Kowalski
No. 85-1303.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Mar 24, 1986.
Published
Sup. Ct. Minn. Certiorari denied.