Ahoyian v. Massachusetts Tpk. Auth., 371 U.S. 186 (1962). · Go Syfert
Ahoyian v. Massachusetts Tpk. Auth., 371 U.S. 186 (1962). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
25 citation events across 8 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: Citizens Committee for the Hudson Valley, the Sierra Club and the Village of Tarrytown, New York v. John Volpe, Individually and as Secretary of Transportation of the Unitedstates, Walter J. Hickel, Individually and as Secretary of the Interior of Theunited States, Stanley S. Resor, Individually and as Secretary of the Army Ofthe Unitedstates, and William F. Cassidy, Individually and as Chief of Engineers, Corpsof Engineers of the U.S. Army, J. Burch McMorran and as Commissioner of the Department of Transportation of Thestate of New York,intervenor-Appellant. Citizens Committee for the Hudson Valley, the Sierra Club and the Village Oftarrytown, New York v. J. Burch McMorran Individually and as Commissioner of the Department Oftransportation of the State of New York (ca2, 1970-04-16)
Treatment trajectory · 1962 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1962 1994 2026
Top citers, strongest first. 2 distinct citers. How cited ↗
discussed Cited "see" Citizens Committee for the Hudson Valley v. Volpe (2×)
2d Cir. · 1970 · signal: see · confidence high
See Ahoyian v. Massachusetts Turnpike Authority, 211 F.Supp. 668, 669 (D.Mass.), aff’d, 371 U.S. 186 , 83 S.Ct. 265 , 9 L.Ed.2d 228 (1962); Sleepy Hollow Valley Commission v. McMorran, 20 N.Y.2d 190, 195-197 , 282 N.Y.S.2d 242 , 229 N.E.2d 32 (1967); cf. Seneca Nation of Indians v. United States, 338 F.2d 55 (2d Cir. 1964).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
AHOYIAN ET AL.
v.
MASSACHUSETTS TURNPIKE AUTHORITY ET AL.
473.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Dec 3, 1962.
371 U.S. 186
Per Curiam.
Published
APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS.

J. Fleet Cowden for appellants.

Edward O. Proctor, Arthur E. Sutherland and Kevin Hern for appellees.

PER CURIAM.

The motion to affirm is granted and the judgment is affirmed.