green
Positive treatment
5.0 score
Treatment trajectory · 1962 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1962
1994
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 6 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited as authority (rule)
Gaia Ethnobotanical, LLC v. T1 Payments, LLC
Pursuant to Rule 15(a), a court 19 should “freely” give leave to amend “when justice so requires,” and in the absence of a reason 20 such as “undue delay, bad faith or dilatory motive on the part of the movant, repeated failure to 21 cure deficiencies by amendment previously allowed, undue prejudice to the opposing party by 22 virtue of allowance of the amendment, futility of the amendment, etc.” Foman v. Davis, 371 U.S. 23 178, 182 (1962). 24 25 26 1 III.
cited
Cited as authority (rule)
Miyayama v. Hosoda
P. 15(a); Foman v. Davis, 371 U.S. 23 178, 182 (1962).
discussed
Cited as authority (rule)
Aguirre Guerra v. Dematic Corp.
Id. at 1052 (citing Foman v. Davis, 371 U.S. 23 178, 183 (1962)). 24 Rule 15(a) creates a presumption in favor of granting leave to amend, however, 25 leave to amend is properly denied when amendment would be futile.
discussed
Cited "see"
Davenport v. Chrysler Credit Corp.
See Southeastern Aviation, Inc. v. Hurd, 209 Tenn. 639, 655 , 355 S.W.2d 436 , 443 app. dismissed, 371 U.S. 21 , 83 S.Ct. 120 , 9 L.Ed.2d 96 (1962); Willis & Turner v. Moore & Davis, 151 Tenn. 562, 566-67 , 271 S.W. 736 , 737 (1924).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
American Pharmaceutical Ass'n v. United States Department of Justice
See also, United States v. Utah Pharmaceutical Ass’n, 201 F.Supp. 29 (D.Utah, 1962), appeal dismissed for lack of jurisdiction, 306 F.2d 493 (C.A. 10, 1962), aff’d mem. 371 U.S. 24 , 83 S.Ct. 119 , 9 L.Ed.2d 96 ; see in general, American Medical Ass’n v. United States, 317 U.S. 519 , 63 S.Ct. 326 , 87 L.Ed. 434 (1943).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
McIntire v. Estate of Forte
See also Southeastern Aviation, Inc. v. Hurd, 209 Tenn. 639 , 355 S.W.2d 436 (1962), appeal dismissed 371 U.S. 21 , 83 S.Ct. 120 , 9 L.Ed.2d 96 .
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
WASSERMANN
v.
BOARD OF REGENTS OF THE UNIVERSITY OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK.
v.
BOARD OF REGENTS OF THE UNIVERSITY OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK.
312.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Oct 15, 1962.
Per Curiam.
Published
APPEAL FROM THE COURT OF APPEALS OF NEW YORK.
Jacob Rassner for appellant.
PER CURIAM.
The appeal is dismissed for want of a substantial federal question.