green
Positive treatment
Quoted verbatim 3×
8.8 score
“it requires no extended discussion of authority to demonstrate that omissions or concealment or material information can constitute fraud cognizable under the mail fraud statute, without proof of a duty to disclose the information pursuant to a specific statute or regulation.”
Treatment trajectory · 1986 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1986
2006
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 30 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
examined
Cited as authority (quoted)
United States v. Wiener
it requires no extended discussion of authority to demonstrate that omissions or concealment or material information can constitute fraud cognizable under the mail fraud statute, without proof of a duty to disclose the information pursuant to a specific statute or regulation.
examined
Cited as authority (quoted)
United States v. Pitt-Des Moines, Inc.
when an indictment contains all the essential elements of the charged offense, the accused may obtain the factual proof supporting the charge, if vital to his defense, by a motion for a bill of particulars.
discussed
Cited as authority (quoted)
United States v. David Romo, Jr., Ann Romo, Juanita Romo
where the witness appears to be equally available or unavailable to both sides, we think it is well within the district court's discretion to refuse to allow such argument.
cited
Cited "see"
Tuttle v. Combined Insurance
See United States v. Keplinger, 776 F.2d 678, 701 , cert, denied, 476 U.S. 1183 , 106 S.Ct. 2919 , 91 L.Ed.2d 548 (1986).
cited
Cited "see"
Ovalle-Marquez v. United States
See United States v. Keplinger, 776 F.2d 678, 701 (7th Cir.1985), cert. denied 476 U.S. 1183 , 106 S.Ct. 2919 , 91 L.Ed.2d 548 (1986).
cited
Cited "see"
Santiago v. United States
See United States v. Keplinger, 776 F.2d 678, 701 (7th Cir.1985), cert. denied 476 U.S. 1183 , 106 S.Ct. 2919 , 91 L.Ed.2d 548 (1986).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Leslie J. Webster
See United States v. Mosley, 786 F.2d 1330, 1334 (7th Cir.) (‘When an indictment contains all the essential elements of the charged offense, the accused may obtain the *173 factual proof supporting the charges, if vital to his defense, by a motion for a bill of particulars.”), cert. denied, 476 U.S. 1184 , 106 S.Ct. 2919 , 91 L.Ed.2d 548 (1986).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Bobby Russell
See United States v. Maggitt, 778 F.2d 1029, 1035 (5th Cir.1985), cert. denied, 476 U.S. 1184 , 106 S.Ct. 2920 , 91 L.Ed.2d 548 (1986); United States v. Tedford, 875 F.2d 446, 448 (5th Cir.1989) (citations omitted) (this court accepts facts underlying the trial court’s finding of good faith unless clearly erroneous; the court’s ultimate determination that officers acted in good faith is a conclusion of law subject to de novo review).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. William N. Logan, Jr. And Eddie Stanley
(2×)
also: Cited "see, e.g."
See Id. 468 U.S. at 922-24 , 104 S.Ct. at 3420-21 .
discussed
Cited "see"
Turner v. Chicago Housing Authority
See Fleming v. County of Kane, 855 F.2d 496, 497 (7th Cir.1988) (per curiam) (quoting United States v. Keplinger, 776 F.2d 678, 683 (7th Cir.1985), cert. denied, 476 U.S. 1183 , 106 S.Ct. 2919 , 91 L.Ed.2d 548 (1986)) (“Overly long briefs, however, may actually hurt a party’s case, making it ‘far more likely that meritorious arguments will be lost amid the mass of detail.’ ”). 3 .
discussed
Cited "see"
Schmutz v. Bolles
United States v. Bak *1313 er, 693 F.2d 183, 188 (D.C.Cir.1982); see United States v. Keplinger, 776 F.2d 678, 694 (7th Cir.1985), cert. denied, 476 U.S. 1183 , 106 S.Ct. 2919 , 91 L.Ed.2d 548 (1986); see also E.
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Martin Schwimmer
See United States v. Keplinger, 776 F.2d 678, 701 (7th Cir.1985), cert. denied, 476 U.S. 1183 , 106 S.Ct. 2919 , 91 L.Ed.2d 548 (1986); Kevlik v. Goldstein, 724 F.2d 844, 849 (1st Cir.1984).
cited
Cited "see"
Masson v. New Yorker Magazine, Inc.
See Herbert v. Lando, 781 F.2d 298, 310-11 (2nd Cir.), cert. denied, 476 U.S. 1182 , 106 S.Ct. 2916 , 91 L.Ed.2d 548 (1986).
cited
Cited "see"
Masson v. The New Yorker Magazine
See Herbert v. Lando, 781 F.2d 298, 310-11 (2nd Cir.), cert. denied, 476 U.S. 1182 , 106 S.Ct. 2916 , 91 L.Ed.2d 548 (1986).
discussed
Cited "see"
25 soc.sec.rep.ser. 443, Medicare&medicaid Gu 37,849, 28 Fed. R. Evid. Serv. 223 United States of America v. Bay State Ambulance and Hospital Rental Service, Inc. And Michael G. Kotzen, United States of America v. John L. Felci
See United States v. Keplinger, 776 F.2d 678, 701 (7th Cir.1985), cert. denied, 476 U.S. 1183 , 106 S.Ct. 2919 , 91 L.Ed.2d 548 (1986); United States v. Friedman, 445 F.2d 1076 , 1085 n. 4 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, 404 U.S. 958 , 92 S.Ct. 326 , 30 L.Ed.2d 275 (1971).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Bay State Ambulance & Hospital Rental Service, Inc.
See United States v. Keplinger, 776 F.2d 678, 701 (7th Cir.1985), cert. denied, 476 U.S. 1183 , 106 S.Ct. 2919 , 91 L.Ed.2d 548 (1986); United States v. Friedman, 445 F.2d 1076 , 1085 n. 4 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, 404 U.S. 958 , 92 S.Ct. 326 , 30 L.Ed.2d 275 (1971).
cited
Cited "see"
Bernstein v. Crazy Eddie, Inc.
See United States v. Keplinger, 776 F.2d 678, 700 (2d Cir.1985), cert. denied, 476 U.S. 1183 , 106 S.Ct. 2919 , 91 L.Ed.2d 548 (1986).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Bruce L. Craig
See United States v. Maggitt, 778 F.2d 1029, 1033 (5th Cir.1985), cert. denied, 476 U.S. 1184 , 106 S.Ct. 2920 , 91 L.Ed.2d 548 (1986); United States v. Gant, 759 F.2d 484, 486 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 474 U.S. 851 , 106 S.Ct. 149 , 88 L.Ed.2d 123 (1985).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Laurence John Layton
See United States v. Keplinger, 776 F.2d 678, 700 (7th Cir.1985), cert. denied, 476 U.S. 1183 , 106 S.Ct. 2919 , 91 L.Ed.2d 548 (1986) (attorneys representing corporation had no attorney-client relationship with individual employees, where “no express agreement for individual representation was made” and where employees never asked attorney directly or indirectly to represent them).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Frederick Ines Gordon, United States of America v. Edward Loeswick
See United States v. Mosley, 786 F.2d 1330, 1333 (7th Cir.), cert denied, 476 U.S. 1184 , 106 S.Ct. 2919 , 91 L.Ed.2d 548 (1986); United States v. Price, 763 F.2d 640, 643 (4th Cir.1985); United States v. Lyons, 703 F.2d 815, 821 (5th Cir.1983); United States v. Berardi, 629 F.2d 723, 729 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 449 U.S. 995 , 101 S.Ct. 534 , 66 L.Ed.2d 293 (1980); United States v. Sheehy, 541 F.2d 123, 130 (1st Cir.1976); United States v. Untiedt, 493 F.2d 1056 , 1059 n. 3 (8th Cir.), cert. denied, 419 U.S. 862 , 95 S.Ct. 115 , 42 L.Ed.2d 98 (1974); United States v. Frank, 290 F.2d 195, 196 …
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. David Driver
See United States v. Keplinger, 776 F.2d 678, 694 (7th Cir.1985), cert. denied, — U.S. —, 106 S.Ct. 2919 , 91 L.Ed.2d 548 (1986).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Eugene Hannigan
(2×)
See also, e.g., United States v. Keplinger, 776 F.2d 678, 691 (7th Cir.1985) ("Since the government is under no duty to negate all possible innocent inferences from a set of circumstantial facts, it should not be required to present proof that the custom is 'invariable.' Instead, it is sufficient to prove that mailing is the sender's regular business practice." (citation omitted)), cert. denied, 476 U.S. 1183 , 106 S.Ct. 2919 , 91 L.Ed.2d 548 (1986); United States v. Miller, 676 F.2d 359, 362 (9th Cir.) (where an employee testified that all hand-delivered documents were marked "delivered," but…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Craig Chapman and Jack E. Wright
See, e.g., United States v. Maggitt, 778 F.2d 1029 , 1032-33 n. 2 (5th Cir.1985), cert. denied, 476 U.S. 1184 , 106 S.Ct. 2920 , 91 L.Ed.2d 548 (1986); United States v. McCain, 677 F.2d 657, 662 (8th Cir.1982).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Martin v. Valley National Bank
See, e.g., United States v. Keplinger, 776 F.2d 678, 699-701 (7th Cir.1985), cert. denied, 476 U.S. 1183 , 106 S.Ct. 2919 , 91 L.Ed.2d 548 (1986); Odmark v. Westside Bancorporation, Inc., 636 F.Supp. 552, 555-56 (W.D.Wash.1986).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Oldenburg
See also United States v. Keplinger, 776 F.2d 678, 691 (7th Cir.1985), ce rt. denied, 476 U.S. 1183 , 106 S.Ct. 2919 , 91 L.Ed.2d 548 (1986) (proof of “invariable” office custom not required); but see United States v. Burks, 867 F.2d 795, 797 (3d Cir.1989) (evidence found insufficient where office procedure was use of mails “most” or “99%” of the time, with some exceptions).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Dell
“An indictment is sufficient if it contains the elements of the offense charged and adequately informs the defendant of the specific charges against him, enabling him to prepare a defense for trial and permitting him to plead an acquittal or conviction in order to bar any further prosecution for the same offense.” United States v. Brack, 747 F.2d 1142, 1146 (7th Cir.1984), cert. denied, 469 U.S. 1216 , 105 *191 S.Ct. 1193, 84 L.Ed.2d 339 (1985); see also United States v. Mosley, 786 F.2d 1330, 1334 (7th Cir.), cert. denied, 476 U.S. 1184 , 106 S.Ct. 2919 , 91 L.Ed.2d 548 (1986).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Rigoberto Moya-Gomez Celestino Orlando Estevez Amado Raphael Leon Adalberto Herrera and Menelao Orlando Estevez
His argument is twofold: first, count 21 does not set forth any factual allegations such as the predicate offenses or overt acts in support of the charge; and second, it also fails to incorporate by reference any other counts in the indictment as predicate offenses. 40 Celestino contends that the government’s tactic of withholding this information deprived him of the opportunity to defend against the CCE charge. 41 “[A]n indictment is sufficient if it, first, contains the elements of the offense charged and fairly informs a defendant of the charge against which he must defend, and, second,…
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Nelson v. Ferrey
See also United States v. Keplinger, 776 F.2d 678, 696 (7th Cir.1985), cert. denied, 476 U.S. 1183 , 106 S.Ct. 2919 , 91 L.Ed.2d 548 (1986).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Michael J. Guinan
For, while “the hearsay rules and the Confrontation Clause ... ‘stem from the same root,’ ... the two are not equivalent.” Vretta, 790 F.2d at 660 (quoting Dutton v. Evans, 400 U.S. 74, 86 , 91 S.Ct. 210, 218 , 27 L.Ed.2d 213 (1970)); see also, United States v. Keplinger, 776 F.2d 678, 695 (7th Cir.1985), cert. denied, 476 U.S. 1183 , 106 S.Ct. 2919 , 91 L.Ed.2d 548 (1986).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Joseph Silvano, Jr., United States of America v. William P. McNeill
United States v. Bush, 522 F.2d 641, 646 (7th Cir.1975), cert. denied, 424 U.S. 977 , 96 S.Ct. 1484 , 47 L.Ed.2d 748 (1976); see also United States v. Keplinger, 776 F.2d 678, 697-98 (7th Cir.1985), cert. denied, — U.S. —, 106 S.Ct. 2919 , 91 L.Ed.2d 548 (1986).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Mosley
v.
United States
v.
United States
No. 85-1909.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Jun 16, 1986.
Published
C. A. 7th Cir. Certiorari denied.