green
Positive treatment
3.5 score
Treatment trajectory · 1987 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1987
2006
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 8 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. McHugh
See U.S. v. Elkins, 795 F.2d 919, 922-23 (11th Cir.), cert. denied, 479 U.S. 952 , 107 S.Ct. 443 , 93 L.Ed.2d 391 (1986); U.S. v. Davenport, 935 F.2d 1223 (11th Cir.1991).
discussed
Cited "see"
Richardson v. Luther
(2×)
also: Cited "see, e.g."
See Heath v. United States Parole Comm’n, 788 F.2d 85, 89-90 (2d Cir.1986), cert. denied, 479 U.S. 953 , 107 S.Ct. 443 , 93 L.Ed.2d 391 (1986).
cited
Cited "see"
D'Amato v. United States Parole Commission
See Heath v. United States Parole Comm’n, 788 F.2d 85, 89 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 107 S.Ct. 443 , 93 L.Ed.2d 391 (1986).
cited
Cited "see"
Frank D'AmAto v. United States Parole Commission, Thomas Stabile v. United States Parole Commission, James R. Moore v. United States Parole Commission and Dennis M. Luther
See Heath v. United States Parole Comm'n, 788 F.2d 85, 89 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, --- U.S. ----, 107 S.Ct. 443 , 93 L.Ed.2d 391 (1986).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Shakur v. United States
See, e.g., Heath v. U.S. Parole Comm’n, 788 F.2d 85, 92 (2d Cir.1986) (“The Commission is not obligated to follow the recommendations of the sentencing court.”), cert. denied, 479 U.S. 953 , 107 S.Ct. 443 , 93 L.Ed.2d 391 (1986); Dioguardi v. United States, 587 F.2d 572, 574-75 (2d Cir.1978) (the Commission’s decision to grant or deny parole is not part of the sentencing process).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Manuel Cortinas v. United States Parole Commission, Southwest Region
See United States v. Wickham, 618 F.2d 1307, 1310 (9th Cir.1979) (requiring demonstration of prejudice by showing impaired ability to contest alleged violation or showing adverse effect upon ability to present favorable evidence); see also Heath v. United States Parole Comm’n, 788 F.2d 85, 89 (2d Cir.) (delay between issuance of warrant and revocation hearing must have resulted in prejudice to warrant habeas relief (citing, inter alia, Lambert v. Warden, United States Penitentiary, 591 F.2d 4, 7-8 (5th Cir.1979) (per curiam) (failure of Commission to comply with statutory time limits does no…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Meagher v. Dugger
See 18 U.S.C. § 4210 (b)(2) (1982) (“[I]n case of a parolee who has been convicted of a Federal, State, or local crime committed subsequent to his release on parole, and such crime is punishable by a term of imprisonment, ... the Commission shall determine ... where all or any part of the unexpired term being served at the time of parole shall run concurrently or consecutively with the sentence imposed for the new offense.”), repealed by Pub.L. 98-473, § 218 (a)(5), 98 Stat. 2027 (1984); see also D'Amato v. United States Parole Commission, 837 F.2d 72 , 79 (2nd Cir.1988) (“18 U.S.C. §…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Glenn G. Goetz
United States v. Studnicka, 777 F.2d 652, 659 (11th Cir.1985); see also United States v. Elkins, 795 F.2d 919, 924 (11th Cir.) (upheld continuance granted due to confusion over appointment of defense counsel and to allow counsel adequate time to prepare for trial), cert. denied, - U.S. -, 107 S.Ct. 443 , 93 L.Ed.2d 391 (1986). 3 The district court in this case explicitly relied on this subsection and made the required finding that the ends of justice served by granting the continuance outweighed the interest of the public and the defendant in a speedy trial.
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Riley
v.
Texas
v.
Texas
No. 86-5553.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Nov 10, 1986.
Published
Ct. App. Tex., 1st Dist. Certiorari denied.