In re Disbarment of Speert, 479 U.S. 958 (1986). · Go Syfert
Search
In re Disbarment of Speert, 479 U.S. 958 (1986). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
9 citation events (2 in the last 25 years) across 5 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: Michael B. Price v. Time, Inc. (ca11, 2005-07-15)
Top citers, strongest first. 4 distinct citers. How cited ↗
discussed Cited "see" Michael B. Price v. Time, Inc.
11th Cir. · 2005 · signal: see · confidence high
See Harris v. United States, 768 F.2d 1240, 1242 (11th Cir.1985), vacated on other grounds, 479 U.S. 957 , 107 S.Ct. 450 , 93 L.Ed.2d 398 (1986). 73 Moreover, so far as the record before us shows, none of the women was under oath when she spoke to Price or his counsel and none was subject to cross-examination.
cited Cited "see" Price v. Time, Inc.
11th Cir. · 2005 · signal: see · confidence high
See Harris v. United States, 768 F.2d 1240, 1242 (11th Cir.1985), vacated on other grounds, 479 U.S. 957 , 107 S.Ct. 450 , 93 L.Ed.2d 398 (1986).
discussed Cited "see" Bonanno v. United States
Ct. Cl. · 1987 · signal: see · confidence high
See Harris v. United States, 768 F.2d 1240, 1242 (11th Cir.1985) (“[I]ntemational agreements should be construed more like contracts than statutes.”), vacated and remanded in light of Harris v. United States, — U.S.-, 107 S.Ct. 450 , 93 L.Ed.2d 398 (1986); Board of County Comm’rs v. Aerolineas Peruanasa, S.A., 307 F.2d 802 , 806 (5th Cir.1962) (“[I]n construing the ... [a] treaty, as other contracts, we give consideration to the intent of the parties so as to carry out their manifest purpose.”), cert. denied, 371 U.S. 961 , 83 S.Ct. 543 , 9 L.Ed.2d 510 (1963); but see Air France v.…
discussed Cited "see" Philip George Stuart, Sr. v. United States of America, Mons Kapoor v. United States (2×)
9th Cir. · 1987 · signal: see · confidence high
See Harris v. United States, 768 F.2d 1240, 1242 (11th Cir.1985), vacated, — U.S. -, 107 S.Ct. 450 , 93 L.Ed.2d 398 (1986) (remanded for reconsideration in light of O’Connor v. United States, — U.S. -, 107 S.Ct. 347 , 93 L.Ed.2d 206 (1986)); Co plin v. United States, 761 F.2d 688, 691 (Fed.Cir.1985), aff'd sub nom.
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
In re Disbarment of Speert
No. D-588.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Nov 17, 1986.
479 U.S. 958
Published

It is ordered that Victor Allen Speert, of Austin, Tex., be suspended from the practice of law in this Court and that a rule issue, returnable within 40 days, requiring him to show cause why he should not be disbarred from the practice of law in this Court.