green
Positive treatment
5.3 score
Treatment trajectory · 1963 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1963
1994
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 7 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited "see"
Bonck v. Plimsoll Club, Inc.
(2×)
See Moity v. Mahfouz, 242 La. 625 , 137 So.2d 514 (1961) ; Tolbert v. Thomas, 245 La. 200 , 157 So.2d 737 (1963) ; see also The Work of the Louisiana Appellate Courts for the 1961-1962 Term, 23 La.
cited
Cited "see"
Guidry v. Gianfala & Son, Inc.
See Glidden v. Alexandria Concrete Company, 242 La. 625 , 137 So.2d 894 .
cited
Cited "see"
Louisiana State Board of Medical Examiners v. England
See Moity v. Mahfouz, 242 La. 625 , 137 So.2d 517 (per curiam).
discussed
Cited "see"
Louisiana State Board of Medical Examiners v. Eastman
(2×)
See Moity v. Mahfouz, 242 La. 625 , 137 So.2d 514 (per curiam), and Louisiana State Board of Medical Examiners v. Boyd, 251 La. 1043 , 208 So.2d 321.
discussed
Cited "see"
Louisiana State Board of Medical Examiners v. Boyd
(2×)
See Moity v. Mahfouz, 242 La. 625 , 137 So.2d 514 (per curiam).
discussed
Cited "see"
Advertiser, Division of the Independent, Inc. v. Tubbs
(2×)
See Moity v. Mahfouz, 242 La. 625 , 137 So.2d 514 (1961); Tolbert v. Thomas, 245 La. 200 , 157 So.2d 737 (1963); see also The Work of the Louisiana Appellate Courts for the 1961-1962 Term, 23 La.L.Rev. 239, 395 (1963); Tate, Supervisory Powers of the Louisiana Courts of Appeal, 38 Tul.L.Rev. 429, 432 (1964).
discussed
Cited "see"
Tolbert v. Thomas
(2×)
See our per curiam in Moity v. Mahfouz, 242 La. 625 , 137 So.2d 514 .
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Warren J. MOITY
v.
Alex MAHFOUZ
v.
Alex MAHFOUZ
45912.
Supreme Court of Louisiana.
Nov 29, 1961.
Per Curiam.
Cited by 12 opinions | Published
PER CURIAM.
Writs refused. The errors complained of by relator do not justify this Court in exercising its supervisory jurisdiction. By denying this application for writs we are in no way approving of the holding of the Court of Appeal that it is without supervisory jurisdiction. See per curiam in case No. 510 of the Court of Appeal rendered No. 21, 1961. 137 So.2d 513.