Medalist Golf Club, LLC v. Bank One of Michigan, 708 N.W.2d 408 (Mich. 2006). · Go Syfert
Medalist Golf Club, LLC v. Bank One of Michigan, 708 N.W.2d 408 (Mich. 2006). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
145 citation events (145 in the last 25 years) across 12 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: Wersal v. Sexton (ca8, 2012-03-27)
Treatment trajectory · 2006 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
2006 2016 2026
Top citers, strongest first. 31 distinct citers. How cited ↗
examined Cited as authority (quoted) Wersal v. Sexton (2×)
8th Cir. · 2012 · quote attribution · 2 verbatim quotes · confidence low
that a judge has at some time received a campaign contribution from a party, an attorney for a party, a law firm employing an attorney for a party, or a group having common interests with a party or an attorney, cannot reasonably require his or her disqualification.
discussed Cited as authority (quoted) Simpson v. Simpson
S.C. Ct. App. · 2008 · quote attribution · 1 verbatim quote · confidence low
here the standards governing disqualification have not been met, disqualification is not optional; rather, it is prohibited.
discussed Cited as authority (rule) Donald J Trump v. Board of State Canvassers
Mich. · 2016 · confidence medium
In our Court, a recusal leaves the Court shorthanded and, therefore, “deprives the public and litigants of the full collegial body that they have selected as the state’s court of last resort.” Id. at 1040.
discussed Cited as authority (rule) Italo M Parise v. Detroit Entertainment Llc
Mich. · 2011 · confidence medium
Had this $1000 donation been made directly to my campaign, it would have been within the limits established by Michigan law, and “[s]uch limits must be understood as clearly reflecting the Legislature’s, and the people’s, understanding that contributions in these amounts will not supply a basis for disqualification.” Adair v State, 474 Mich 1027, 1042 (2006).
discussed Cited as authority (rule) Anthony Pellegrino v. Ampco Systems Parking (2×)
Mich. · 2010 · confidence medium
Id. at 1051 n 1 (statement of Corrigan, J.); id. at 1053 (statement of Young, J.). 3 See Laird v Tatum, 409 US 824, 837 (1972) (memorandum of Rehnquist, J.). 4 In re Aguinda, 241 F3d 194 , 201 (CA 2, 2001). 5 Justice Young claims that “it is not clear that the duty to sit even applies to collateral motions within cases before this Court.” This distinction is unsupported by any authority.
discussed Cited as authority (rule) Anthony Pellegrino v. Ampco Systems Parking
Mich. · 2010 · confidence medium
Therefore, after considering the instant motion for disqualification, I deny the motion because: (1) I have examined my conscience, and believe that I am able to accord fair and impartial treatment to plaintiff’s counsel and will, as I have always done, decide this case on its merits; (2) based on “objective and reasonable perceptions,” I do not believe that my participation in this case will produce a 5 “serious risk of actual bias impacting the due process rights of a party;” and (3) “based on objective and reasonable perceptions,” I do not believe my participation in this case…
examined Cited as authority (rule) Henry v. Dow Chemical Co. (5×) also: Cited "see", Cited "see, e.g."
Mich. · 2009 · confidence medium
Justice Weaver did not disclose the nature of her “business relationship” that warranted her recusal. 7 See Adair v State of Michigan, 474 Mich 1027, 1047 (2006) (statement of Weaver, J.).
cited Cited as authority (rule) Amyruth L Cooper v. Auto Club Ins Assn
Mich. · 2007 · confidence medium
Id. at 1053.
examined Cited as authority (rule) Grievance Administrator v. Fieger (7×) also: Cited "see", Cited "see, e.g."
Mich. · 2006 · confidence medium
In another recent case, Adair v Michigan, 474 Mich 1027, 1040-1041 (2006), the majority of four lowered the threshold for a justice’s participation when faced with a motion for disqualification.
discussed Cited as authority (rule) in Re Honorable Michael J Haley
Mich. · 2006 · confidence medium
Having been the target of multiple motions for disqualification, it is understandable that the current majority prefers this approach and characterizes such accusations as “vague, subjective, and increasingly politically directed.” Adair, supra at 1039 (statement by Taylor, C.J., and Markman, J.).
discussed Cited as authority (rule) Grievance Administrator v. Fieger (2×) also: Cited "see"
Mich. · 2006 · confidence medium
Id. at 1053.
discussed Cited as authority (rule) In re Haley
Mich. · 2006 · confidence medium
Having been the target of multiple motions for disqualification, it is understandable that the current majority prefers this approach and characterizes such accusations as “vague, subjective, and increasingly politically directed.” Adair, supra at 1039 (statement by Taylor, C.
cited Cited "see" State v. Beasley
Ohio · 2018 · signal: see · confidence high
See Adair v. State, Dept. ofEdn., 474 Mich. 1027 , 1033-1034, 709 NW.2d 567 (2006).
cited Cited "see" Karen Marie Krake v. Auto Club Insurance Association
Mich. Ct. App. · 2018 · signal: see · confidence high
See Adair v State, 474 Mich 1027, 1029 ; 709 NW2d 567 (2006) (opinion by TAYLOR, C.J., and MARKMAN, J.).
cited Cited "see" Karen Marie Krake v. Auto Club Insurance Association
Mich. Ct. App. · 2018 · signal: see · confidence high
See Adair v State, 474 Mich 1027, 1029 ; 709 NW2d 567 (2006) (opinion by TAYLOR, C.J., and MARKMAN, J.).
cited Cited "see" in Re Executive Message (Brown v. Governor)
Mich. · 2011 · signal: see · confidence high
See Adair v Michigan, 474 Mich 1027 , 1036-37 (2006).
discussed Cited "see" State v. Jacobs
Minn. Ct. App. · 2010 · signal: see · confidence high
State v. Bradford, 618 N.W.2d 782, 798 (Minn.2000) (quotation omitted); see Adair v. State, Dept of Educ., 474 Mich. 1027 , 709 N.W.2d 567, 576 (2006) (noting that attorney general’s office, as prosecutor’s office in which justices’ spouses were employed, operated under “traditional credo” that office prevailed when “justice is done,” not merely when it won case).
discussed Cited "see" United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co. v. Michigan Catastrophic Claims Ass'n (2×) also: Cited "see, e.g."
Mich. · 2009 · signal: see · confidence high
See Adair, supra at 1028 n 1.
cited Cited "see" Hartford Ins Co of the Midwest v. Mich Catastrophic Claims Assn
Mich. · 2009 · signal: see · confidence high
See Adair, supra at 1028 n 1.
cited Cited "see" United States Fidelity Ins v. Michigan Catastrophic Claims Assn
Mich. · 2009 · signal: see · confidence high
See Adair, supra at 1028 n 1.
cited Cited "see" Citizens Protecting Michigan's Constitution v. Secretary of State
Mich. · 2008 · signal: see · confidence high
See Adair v Michigan, 474 Mich 1027 , 1051 (2006) (statement by Kelly, J.) I, Corbin R.
cited Cited "see" Caperton v. AT Massey Coal Co., Inc.
W. Va. · 2008 · signal: see · confidence high
See generally Adair v. State, Department of Education, 474 Mich. 1027 , 709 N.W.2d 567 (2006). .
discussed Cited "see, e.g." Derrick Lashon Braddock v. Parole Board
Mich. Ct. App. · 2024 · signal: see, e.g. · confidence low
See, e.g., Adair v State of Michigan, 474 Mich 1027, 1040 ; 709 NW2d 567 (2006) (“an even division . . . effectively rendering null and void the work of the Court and leaving intact lower court decisions . . . .”) (statement of Taylor, C.J., and Markman, J.); see also MCR 7.315(A) (“Except for affirmance of action by a lower court or tribunal by even division of the justices, a decision of the Court must be made by concurrence of a majority of the justices voting.”) But this case is not controlled by Robert’s Rules of Order.
discussed Cited "see, e.g." Commonwealth v. Duart
Mass. · 2017 · signal: see, e.g. · confidence medium
See, e.g., Adair v. State, 474 Mich. 1027, 1029-1030 (2006) (concluding recusal policy “that no judge can hear any case in which a party is represented by a law firm or a prosecutor’s office in which a relative of that judge is employed, even if that relative has no personal involvement in the case and stands to gain nothing materially by its outcome . . . constitutes an unfair and unwise policy”).
discussed Cited "see, e.g." Fieger v. Cox
Mich. · 2007 · signal: see, e.g. · confidence low
See, e.g., Adair v. State of Michigan, 474 Mich. 1027, 1043 , 709 N.W.2d 567 (2006) (statement of Cavanagh, J.), 1029 n. 2, (statement of Taylor, C.J., and Markman, J.); In re JK, 468 Mich. 202, 220 , 661 N.W.2d 216 (2003) (statement of Weaver, J.).
discussed Cited "see, e.g." Johnson v. Henry Ford Hosp.
Mich. · 2007 · signal: see, e.g. · confidence low
See, e.g., Adair v. State of Michigan, 474 Mich. 1027, 1043 , 709 N.W.2d 567 (2006) (statement of Cavanagh, J.), 1029 n. 2, (statement of Taylor, C.J., and Markman, J.); *516 In re JK, 468 Mich. 202, 220 , 661 N.W.2d 216 (2003) (statement of Weaver, J.).
discussed Cited "see, e.g." Tate v. City of Dearborn
Mich. · 2007 · signal: see, e.g. · confidence low
See, e.g., Adair v. State of Michigan, 474 Mich. 1027, 1043 , 709 N.W.2d 567 (2006) (statement of Cavanagh, J.), 1029 n. 2, (statement of Taylor, C.J., and Markman, J.); In re JK, 468 Mich. 202, 220 , 661 N.W.2d 216 (2003) (statement of Weaver, J.).
discussed Cited "see, e.g." State Auto. Mut. Ins. Co. v. Fieger
Mich. · 2007 · signal: see, e.g. · confidence low
See, e.g., Adair v. State of Michigan, 474 Mich. 1027, 1043 , 709 N.W.2d 567 (2006) (statement of Cavanagh, J.), 1029 n. 2, 709 N.W.2d 567 , (statement of Taylor, C.J., and Markman, J.); In re JK, 468 Mich. 202, 220 , 661 N.W.2d 216 (2003) (statement of Weaver, J.).
discussed Cited "see, e.g." Ansari v. Gold
Mich. · 2007 · signal: see, e.g. · confidence low
See, e.g., Adair v. State of Michigan, 474 Mich. 1027, 1043 , 709 N.W.2d 567 (2006) (statement of Cavanagh, J.), 1029 n. 2, (statement of Taylor, C.J., and Markman, J.); In re J.K., 468 Mich. 202, 220 , 661 N.W.2d 216 (2003) (statement of Weaver, J.).
discussed Cited "see, e.g." Short v. Antonini
Mich. · 2007 · signal: see, e.g. · confidence low
See, e.g., Adair v. State of Michigan, 474 Mich. 1027, 1043 , 709 N.W.2d 567 (2006) (statement of Cavanagh, J.), 1029 n. 2, (statement of Taylor, C.J., and Markman, J.); In re J.K., 468 Mich. 202, 220 , 661 N.W.2d 216 (2003) (statement of Weaver, J.).
discussed Cited "see, e.g." Flemister v. TRAVELING MEDICAL SERVICES, PC
Mich. · 2007 · signal: see, e.g. · confidence low
See, e.g., Adair v. State of Michigan, 474 Mich. 1027, 1043 , 709 N.W.2d 567 (2006) (statement of Cavanagh, J.), 1029 n. 2, (statement of Taylor, C.J., and Markman, J.); In re JK, 468 Mich. 202, 220 , 661 N.W.2d 216 (2003) (statement of Weaver, J.).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
MEDALIST GOLF CLUB, L.L.C., f/k/a Medalist Golf Practice Facility, L.L.C., Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
BANK ONE OF MICHIGAN, f/k/a NBD Bank, a Michigan Banking Corporation, Defendant-Appellee.
129608.
Michigan Supreme Court.
Jan 30, 2006.
708 N.W.2d 408

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the May 16, 2005 order and the August 23, 2005 judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court.