green
Positive treatment
1.9 score
Treatment trajectory · 1978 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1978
2002
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 2 distinct citers.
discussed
Cited as authority (rule)
Salter v. E & J HEALTHCARE, INC.
The plaintiff filed a complaint against defendant, his former employer, alleging that he “was fired from his job in retaliation for his pursuit of remedies made available to him by the North Carolina Workmen’s Compensation Act after receiving injuries on the job.” Id. at 293, 244 S.E.2d at 273 .
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Leach v. Northern Telecom, Inc.
(2×)
See, e.g., Dockery v. Lampart Table Co., 36 N.C.App. 293 , 244 S.E.2d 272 , disc. rev. denied, 295 N.C. 465 , 246 S.E.2d 215 (1978) (at-will employee does not have cognizable claim for discharge in retaliation for filing worker’s compensation claim).
Kenneth DOCKERY
v.
LAMPART TABLE COMPANY and U. S. Furniture Industries.
v.
LAMPART TABLE COMPANY and U. S. Furniture Industries.
Supreme Court of North Carolina.
Jul 14, 1978.
Cited by 3 opinions | Published
Morgan, Byerly, Post, Herring & Keziah, for plaintiff.
Schock, Schock & Schock, for defendants.
Petition by Plaintiff for discretionary review under GS 7A-31, 36 N.C.App. 293, 244 S.E.2d 272. Denied.