green
Positive treatment
1.4 score
Treatment trajectory · 1980 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1980
2003
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 3 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited "see"
Barnhouse v. American Express Financial Advisors, Inc.
The party seeking enforcement of an arbitration agreement has the burden of showing the existence of that agreement, Sciolino v. TD Waterhouse Investor Servs., Inc., ___ N.C.App. ___, ___, 562 S.E.2d 64, 66 , (2002), and may do so with affidavit(s) and documentary evidence filed with or presented into evidence in the trial court and, with the trial court's permission, the use of "oral testimony or depositions," N.C.G.S. § 1A-1, Rule 43(e) (2001) (permissible evidence to be heard on motions); see Hankins v. Somers, 39 N.C.App. 617, 619-20 , 251 S.E.2d 640, 642 , disc. review denied 297 N.C. 30…
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Blair v. Norwegian Caribbean Lines, A/S
See, e.g., Hankins v. Somers, 39 N.C.App. 617 , 251 S.E.2d 640 , pet. discr. rev. denied, 297 N.C. 300 , 254 S.E.2d 920 (1979).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Southern Case, Inc. v. Management Recruiters International, Inc.
Compare Federal Insurance Co. v. Piper Aircraft Corp., 341 F.Supp. 855 (W.D.N.C.1972), aff'd, 473 F.2d 909 (4th Cir. 1973) (holding that such advertisements satisfy jurisdictional requisites), with Hankins v. Somers, 39 N.C.App. 617 , 251 S.E.2d 640 , pet. discr. rev. denied, 297 N.C. 300 (1979) (questioning Piper in holding that “the placing of advertisements in national magazines, without more ...” does not satisfy minimum contacts).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
HANKINS
v.
SOMERS
v.
SOMERS
No. 66 PC.
Supreme Court of North Carolina.
May 1, 1979.
Published
Petition by defendants for discretionary review under G.S. 7A-31 denied 1 May 1979.