Gooden v. Brooks, 298 N.C. 806 (N.C. 1979). · Go Syfert
Search
Gooden v. Brooks, 298 N.C. 806 (N.C. 1979). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
“having multiple objectives of which some are not penal in nature, the statute cannot be deemed a penal statute . . . .”
50 citation events (11 in the last 25 years) across 7 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: Tomlinson v. Camel City Motors, Inc. (nc, 1991-10-03)
Treatment trajectory · 1980 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1980 2003 2026
Top citers, strongest first. 2 distinct citers. How cited ↗
examined Cited as authority (quoted) Tomlinson v. Camel City Motors, Inc. (2×)
N.C. · 1991 · quote attribution · 2 verbatim quotes · confidence low
having multiple objectives of which some are not penal in nature, the statute cannot be deemed a penal statute . . . .
cited Cited "see" Coker v. DaimlerChrysler Corp.
N.C. Ct. App. · 2005 · signal: see · confidence high
See Holley v. Coggin Pontiac, 43 N.C.App. 229, 241 , 259 S.E.2d 1, 9 , disc. rev. denied, 298 N.C. 806 , 261 S.E.2d 919 (1979).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
GOODEN
v.
BROOKS, COMR. OF LABOR
No. 39; (Formerly No. 70 PC Spring Term 1979.).
Supreme Court of North Carolina.
May 1, 1979.
298 N.C. 806
Published
2 passages pin-cited by 1 case
Pinpoint authority: bottom 66%
Citer courts: Supreme Court of North Carolina (2)

Order dated 1 May 1979 (297 N.C. 299) allowing discretionary review under G.S. 7A-31 is vacated and the proceedings in the cause in the Supreme Court are dismissed 4 December 1979.