Cochran v. City of Charlotte, 288 S.E.2d 380 (N.C. 1982). · Go Syfert
Search
Cochran v. City of Charlotte, 288 S.E.2d 380 (N.C. 1982). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
“hen a party to a contract gives notice that he will not honor the contract, the other party to the contract is no longer required to make a tender or otherwise to perform under the contract because of the anticipatory breach of the first party.”
26 citation events (6 in the last 25 years) across 4 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: In Re Eagle Creek Subdivision, LLC (nceb, 2008-12-03)
Treatment trajectory · 1982 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1982 2004 2026
Top citers, strongest first. 1 distinct citer. How cited ↗
examined Cited as authority (quoted) In Re Eagle Creek Subdivision, LLC
Bankr. E.D.N.C. · 2008 · signal: see · quote attribution · 1 verbatim quote · confidence high
hen a party to a contract gives notice that he will not honor the contract, the other party to the contract is no longer required to make a tender or otherwise to perform under the contract because of the anticipatory breach of the first party.
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
COCHRAN
v.
CITY OF CHARLOTTE
No. 81 PC.
Supreme Court of North Carolina.
Jan 12, 1982.
288 S.E.2d 380
Published
1 passage pin-cited by 1 case
Pinpoint authority: bottom 72%
Citer courts: E.D. North Carolina (1)

Petition by plaintiffs for discretionary review under G.S. 7A-31 denied 12 January 1982.