discussed Cited "see, e.g." Faulkenbury v. TEACHERS'AND STATE EMPLOYEES'RETIREMENT SYSTEM N.C.G.S. § 1-294 (1983); Herring v. Pugh, 126 N.C. *423 852, 36 S.E. 287 (1900); see also Hightower v. Hightower, 85 N.C.App. 333 , 354 S.E.2d 743 , cert. denied, 320 N.C. 792 , 361 S.E.2d 76 (1987) (after entry of judgment and notice of appeal, trial court retains authority to approve the judgment and direct its filing).

discussed Cited "see, e.g." Braswell v. Pitt County Memorial Hospital (2×) The Commission must make findings bearing upon this issue for, “[i]f a plaintiff seeks approval of the physician within a reasonable time, if the Commission approves a plaintiffs choice and if the treatment sought is to effectuate a cure or rehabilitation, then the employer has a statutory duty under [G.S.] 97-25 to pay for the treatment.” Id. at 126, 394 S.E.2d at 663 ; See also, Hudson v. Mastercraft Div., Collins & Aikman Corp., 86 N.C.App. 411 , 358 S.E.2d 134 , disc, review denied, 320 N.C. 792 , 361 S.E.2d 77 (1987).