Simpson v. North Carolina Local Gov't Employees'Ret. Sys., 372 S.E.2d 559 (N.C. 1988). · Go Syfert
Simpson v. North Carolina Local Gov't Employees'Ret. Sys., 372 S.E.2d 559 (N.C. 1988). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
102 citation events (32 in the last 25 years) across 7 distinct courts.
Treatment trajectory · 1988 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1988 2007 2026
Cited for
At page 562 Affirming judgment on appeal in retirement system dispute3 citing cases
At page 564 Determining scope of statutory requirements and policy implications2 citing cases1 listed here
  • Trull v. Cent. Carolina Bank & Trust, 478 S.E.2d 39 (N.C. Ct. App. 1996).published
    Expanding the decision in Merritt to this non-purchase money, commercial transaction would “deprive [s] the [defendants] of the benefits of a bargain, fairly and properly entered, which violates no established public policy.” Merritt, 323…
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Jesse R. SIMPSON, Richard D. Moore, on behalf of themselves and all others similarly situated
v.
NORTH CAROLINA LOCAL GOVERNMENT EMPLOYEES' RETIREMENT SYSTEM, a corporation; Board of Trustees of the North Carolina Local Government Employees' Retirement System, a body politic and corporate; E.T. Barnes, Director of the Retirement System Divisions and Deputy Treasurer for the State of North Carolina (in his official capacity); Harlan E. Boyles, Treasurer of the State of North Carolina and Chairman of the Board of Trustees of the North Carolina Local Government Employees' Retirement System (in his official capacity); and the State of North Carolina.
2A88.
Supreme Court of North Carolina.
Oct 6, 1988.
Published opinion
372 S.E.2d 559
1988 N.C. LEXIS 610
Per Curiam.
Published

Anderson, Schiller & Rutherford, P.A. by Marvin Schiller, Raleigh, for plaintiffs-appellees.

Lacy H. Thornburg, Atty. Gen. by Norma S. Harrell, Asst. Atty. Gen., Raleigh, for defendants-appellants.

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED.