Woolard v. North Carolina Dep't of Transp., 381 S.E.2d 792 (N.C. 1989). · Go Syfert
Woolard v. North Carolina Dep't of Transp., 381 S.E.2d 792 (N.C. 1989). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
92 citation events (65 in the last 25 years) across 4 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: In Re KD (ncctapp, 2006-07-05)
Treatment trajectory · 1989 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1989 2007 2026
Top citers, strongest first. 3 distinct citers. How cited ↗
discussed Cited "see, e.g." In Re KD
N.C. Ct. App. · 2006 · signal: see also · confidence low
See also State v. Knight, 93 N.C.App. 460, 466-67 , 378 S.E.2d 424, 427 (under § 8-53.3, defendant's statement to psychologist that he had been seduced by underage stepdaughter was not privileged because it related to abuse or neglect of child), disc. review denied, 325 N.C. 230 , 381 S.E.2d 789 (1989).
discussed Cited "see, e.g." In re K.D.
N.C. Ct. App. · 2006 · signal: see also · confidence low
See also State v. Knight, 93 N.C.App. 460 , 466-67, 378 S.E.2d 424 , 427 (under § 8-53.3, defendant's statement to psychologist that he had been seduced by underage stepdaughter was not privileged because it related to abuse or neglect of child), disc. review denied, 325 N.C. 230 , 381 S.E.2d 789 (1989).
examined Cited "see, e.g." Smoldt v. Henkels & McCoy, Inc. (3×)
Or. Ct. App. · 2000 · signal: see, e.g. · confidence low
See, e.g., Walton v. Carolina Telephone and Telegraph Company, 93 N.C.App. 368, 375 , 378 S.E.2d 427 , rev. den. 325 N.C. 230 , 381 S.E.2d 792 (1989) (employee's fraud claim was not preempted because representations sued upon were independent of the CBA).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Gilda WOOLARD, Administratrix of the Estate of Douglas Allen Wollard, Deceased
v.
NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION.
240P89.
Supreme Court of North Carolina.
Jul 26, 1989.
381 S.E.2d 792
Published

[*793] Gaskins & Gaskins, Washington, D.C., for plaintiff.

Monroe, Wyne, Atkins & Lennon, Raleigh, for defendant.

ORDER

Upon consideration of the petition filed by Plaintiff in this matter for a writ of certiorari to review the decision of the North Carolina Court of Appeals, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the North Carolina Court of Appeals:

"Denied by order of the Court in conference, this the 26th day of July 1989."