green
Positive treatment
3.0 score
Treatment trajectory · 1992 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1992
2009
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 2 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited "see"
Davenport v. North Carolina Department Of Transportation
(2×)
See Spry v. Winston-Salem/Forsyth County Bd. of Educ., 105 N.C.App. 269 , 412 S.E.2d 687, 689 (Crump cited as authority for proposition, uttered in dicta, that going to final judgment in an administrative proceeding such as that here in issue would not preclude a later Sec. 1983 action challenging the same governmental action, i.e., that they were not the same claim for res judicata purposes), aff'd, 332 N.C. 661 , 422 S.E.2d 575 (1992). 22 The North Carolina courts' general approach to claim-breadth analysis in recent times points in the same direction.
discussed
Cited "see"
Davenport v. North Carolina Department of Transportation
(2×)
See Spry v. Winston-Salem/Forsyth County Bd. of Educ., 105 N.C.App. 269 , 412 S.E.2d 687, 689 (Crump cited as authority for proposition, uttered in dicta, that going to final judgment in an administrative proceeding such as that here in issue would not preclude a later § 1983 action challenging the same governmental action, i.e., that they were not the same claim for res judicata purposes), aff'd, 332 N.C. 661 , 422 S.E.2d 575 (1992).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Susan Dale SPRY
v.
WINSTON-SALEM/FORSYTH COUNTY BOARD OF EDUCATION.
v.
WINSTON-SALEM/FORSYTH COUNTY BOARD OF EDUCATION.
95A92.
Supreme Court of North Carolina.
Nov 19, 1992.
Per Curiam.
Published
Kennedy, Kennedy, Kennedy and Kennedy by Harold L. Kennedy, III, and Harvey L. Kennedy, Winston-Salem, for plaintiff appellant.
Womble Carlyle Sandridge & Rice by Anthony H. Brett, Winston-Salem, for defendant appellee.
Tharrington, Smith & Hargrove by George T. Rogister, Jr., Ann L. Majestic, Allison B. Schafer, and Jonathan A. Blumberg, Raleigh, for amicus curiae North Carolina School Boards Ass'n.
[*576] PER CURIAM.
AFFIRMED.