Matter of Belk v. Wsoc Television, Inc., 424 S.E.2d 905 (N.C. 1992). · Go Syfert
Search
Matter of Belk v. Wsoc Television, Inc., 424 S.E.2d 905 (N.C. 1992). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
25 citation events (9 in the last 25 years) across 5 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: State v. Arnold (ncctapp, 2001-12-18)
Treatment trajectory · 1992 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1992 2009 2026
Top citers, strongest first. 1 distinct citer. How cited ↗
discussed Cited "see, e.g." State v. Arnold (2×)
N.C. Ct. App. · 2001 · signal: see also · confidence low
See also In re Belk, 107 N.C.App. 448 , 420 S.E.2d 682 , appeal dismissed and review denied, 333 N.C. 168 , 424 S.E.2d 905 (1992); Vinson v. Chappell, 3 N.C.App. 348, 350 , 164 S.E.2d 631, 632 (1968), aff'd, 275 N.C. 234 , 166 S.E.2d 686 (1969).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
In the Matter of Timothy BELK, Respondent. WSOC TELEVISION, INC., Intervenor/Petitioner,
v.
STATE of North Carolina ex rel. ATTORNEY GENERAL; Charlotte-Mecklenburg Hospital Authority, The Children's Law Center; Mecklenburg County Area Mental Health, Development Disabilities and Substance Abuse Authority; and Mental Health Association of Mecklenburg County, Inc., Intervenor/Respondents.
376P92.
Supreme Court of North Carolina.
Dec 17, 1992.
424 S.E.2d 905
Published

John H. Hasty, Charlotte, for intervenor/petitioner.

Ann Morgan Sanders, Helen B. Bradford and Marjorie L. Foley, Charlotte, for Children's Law Center.

Jane L. Oliver, Associate Atty. Gen., for the State.

Prior report: 107 N.C.App. 448, 420 S.E.2d 682.

ORDER

Upon consideration of the notice of appeal from the North Carolina Court of Appeals, filed by the Intervenor-Petitioner in this matter pursuant to G.S. 7A-30, and the motion to dismiss the appeal for lack of substantial constitutional question filed by the Attorney General; and upon consideration of the petition for discretionary review of the decision of the North Carolina[*906] Court of Appeals, filed by Intervenor-Petitioner pursuant to G.S. 7A-31, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the North Carolina Court of Appeals: the motion to dismiss the appeal is

"Allowed by order of the Court in conference, this the 17th day of December 1992."

The Petition for Discretionary Review is:

"Denied by order of the Court in conference, this the 17th day of December 1992."