green
Positive treatment
Under Fire
3.2 score
Treatment trajectory · 1996 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1996
2011
2026
Under fire — who is questioning this case
Citations from separate opinions of courts that could overrule this
case.
This is a warning signal, not a treatment change. The flag color above is unaffected.
Concurrence
Sykes v. Health Network Solutions, Inc.
(2019)
“App. 641 , 646, 446 S.E.2d 117 , 121 (quoting *479 Marshall , 302 N.C. at 548 , 276 S.E.2d at 403 ), disc. rev. denied , 337 N.C. 689 , 448 S.E.2d 516 (1994). "[A]ll the facts and circumstances surrounding the transaction" are relevant to determining "[w]hether an act or practice is unfair or deceptive." Id. at 646 , 446 S.E.2d 117 (citing Marshall , 302 N.C. at 548 , 276 S.E.2d at 403 ).”
Top citers, strongest first. 1 distinct citer.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited as authority (rule)
Sykes v. Health Network Solutions, Inc.
App. 641, 646 , 446 S.E.2d 117, 121 (quoting Marshall, 302 N.C. at 548 , 276 S.E.2d at 403 ), disc. rev. denied, 337 N.C. 689 , 448 S.E.2d 516 (1994). “[A]ll the facts and circumstances surrounding the transaction” are relevant to determining “[w]hether an act or practice is unfair or deceptive.” Id. at 646, 436 S.E.2d at 121 (citing Marshall, 302 N.C. at 548 , 276 S.E.2d at 403 ).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
BLUE RIDGE PRODUCTS, INC.
v.
MUNDAY
v.
MUNDAY
No. 289P94.
Supreme Court of North Carolina.
Sep 8, 1994.
Published
Petition by plaintiff for discretionary review pursuant to G.S. 7A-31 denied 8 September 1994.