discussed Cited "see, e.g." Phillips v. Phillips (2×) See, e.g., Station Assocs., Inc. v. Dare County, 350 N.C. 367, 370 , 513 S.E.2d 789, 792 (“ ‘The law does not favor a construction of the language in a deed which will constitute a condition subsequent unless the intention of the parties to create such a restriction upon the title is clearly manifested.’ ” (quoting Washington City Bd. of Educ. v. Edgerton, 244 N.C. 576, 578 , 94 S.E.2d 661, 664 (1956))), reh’g denied, 350 N.C. 600 , 537 S.E.2d 494 (1999).