Dolan v. Dolan, 562 S.E.2d 422 (N.C. 2002). · Go Syfert
Search
Dolan v. Dolan, 562 S.E.2d 422 (N.C. 2002). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
6 citation events (6 in the last 25 years) across 2 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: Cochran v. Cochran (ncctapp, 2009-07-21)
Top citers, strongest first. 2 distinct citers. How cited ↗
discussed Cited "see, e.g." Cochran v. Cochran
N.C. Ct. App. · 2009 · signal: see, e.g. · confidence low
See, e.g., Dolan v. Dolan, 148 N.C.App. 256, 258-59 , 558 S.E.2d 218, 220 (holding that trial court erred in making finding as to tax consequences if parties sold *479 rental property because consequences "were hypothetical and speculative" in the absence of finding that parties would be required to liquidate property), aff'd per curiam, 355 N.C. 484 , 562 S.E.2d 422 (2002); Crowder v. Crowder, 147 N.C.App. 677, 683 , 556 S.E.2d 639, 643 (2001) ("Valuation of marital property may include tax consequences from the sale of an asset only when the sale is imminent and inevitable, rather than hypot…
discussed Cited "see, e.g." Rice v. Rice
N.C. Ct. App. · 2003 · signal: see also · confidence low
This Court has held that "[t]he factors listed under subsection (c) indicate that the legislature intended to grant the trial court the authority to consider the future prospects of the parties, as well as their status at the time of the hearing, in determining whether an equal division of marital assets would be equitable." Harris v. Harris, 84 N.C.App. 353, 359 , 352 S.E.2d 869, 873 (1987); see also Dolan v. Dolan, 148 N.C.App. 256, 259 , 558 S.E.2d 218, 220 (postseparation rental income can be a distributional factor), aff'd, 355 N.C. 484 , 562 S.E.2d 422 (2002) (per curiam); Chandler v. Ch…
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
William Edward DOLAN
v.
Karen A. DOLAN.
48A02.
Supreme Court of North Carolina.
May 10, 2002.
562 S.E.2d 422
Per Curiam.
Published

[*423] Hatfield & Hatfield, by Kathryn K. Hatfield, Greensboro, for plaintiff-appellant.

Floyd & Jacobs, L.L.P., by Jack W. Floyd, Greensboro, for defendant-appellee.

Wyatt Early Harris & Wheeler, L.L.P., by A. Doyle Early, Jr., High Point, on behalf of the North Carolina Chapter of the American Academy of Matrimonial Lawyers, amicus curiae.

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED.

Justice EDMUNDS did not participate in the consideration or decision of this case.