Woodlief v. Mecklenburg Cnty., 632 S.E.2d 775 (N.C. 2006). · Go Syfert
Search
Woodlief v. Mecklenburg Cnty., 632 S.E.2d 775 (N.C. 2006). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
4 citation events across 2 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: Brookline Residential, LLC v. City of Charlotte (ncctapp, 2017-01-17)
Top citers, strongest first. 1 distinct citer. How cited ↗
discussed Cited "see" Brookline Residential, LLC v. City of Charlotte (2×)
N.C. Ct. App. · 2017 · signal: see · confidence high
See Woodlief v. Mecklenburg Cty ., 176 N.C.App. 205 , 209, 625 S.E.2d 904 , 907 ("The rules applicable to the construction of statutes are equally applicable to the construction of municipal ordinances." (citation and quotation marks omitted)), disc. review denied , 360 N.C. 492 , 632 S.E.2d 775 (2006).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
WOODLIEF
v.
MECKLENBURG COUNTY.
161P06.
Supreme Court of North Carolina.
May 4, 2006.
632 S.E.2d 775
Published

Robert Hagemann, Senior Assistant City Attorney, for Mecklenburg County, et al.

William H. Sturges, Charlotte, for Insite Engineering, et al.

The following order has been entered on the motion filed on the 25th day of April 2006 by Plaintiff to Dismiss Petition for Discretionary Review:

"Motion Allowed by order of the Court in conference this the 4th day of May 2006."