Weaver v. Sheppa, 657 S.E.2d 669 (N.C. 2008). · Go Syfert
Search
Weaver v. Sheppa, 657 S.E.2d 669 (N.C. 2008). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
30 citation events (30 in the last 25 years) across 2 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: Springs v. City of Charlotte (ncctapp, 2010-11-16)
Treatment trajectory · 2009 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
2009 2017 2026
Top citers, strongest first. 1 distinct citer. How cited ↗
discussed Cited "see, e.g." Springs v. City of Charlotte
N.C. Ct. App. · 2010 · signal: see also · confidence low
See also Weaver v. Sheppa, 186 N.C.App. 412, 417-18 , 651 S.E.2d 395, 399 (2007) (holding court erred in granting defendants' motion for JNOV where plaintiffs' expert testified to "`a high degree of certainty'" as to cause of injury), disc. review allowed, 362 N.C. 180 , 657 S.E.2d 669 , aff'd per curiam, 362 N.C. 341 , 661 S.E.2d 733 (2008); Seay v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc., 180 N.C.App. 432, 436 , 637 S.E.2d 299, 302 (2006) ("`In order to be sufficient to support a finding that a stated cause produced a stated result, evidence on causation must indicate a reasonable scientific probability that …
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Kenneth Wayne WEAVER and Ann Weaver
v.
Charles Michael SHEPPA, M.D., Leslie Patricia Marshall, M.D., and Raleigh Emergency Medicine Associates, Inc.
No. 558PA07..
Supreme Court of North Carolina.
Jan 24, 2008.
657 S.E.2d 669
William P. Daniel, James L. Jansen, Raleigh, Leslie C. O'Toole, Cary, for Sheppa, et. al., Joe T. Knott, III, Bruce W. Berger, Raleigh, for Weaver.
Newby.
Published

Upon consideration of the petition filed on the 19th day of November 2007 by Defendants in this matter for discretionary review of the decision of the North Carolina Court of Appeals pursuant to G.S. 7A-31, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the North Carolina Court of Appeals: "Allowed by order of the Court in conference, this the 24th day of January 2008."

Defendants shall forthwith submit an appeal bond to this Court, as provided by Appellate Rule 17(b). The bond may be in cash or by a written undertaking with good and sufficient surety in the sum of $250.00.

Therefore the case is docketed as of the date of this order's certification. Briefs of the respective parties shall be submitted to this Court within the times allowed and in the manner provided by Appellate Rule 15(g)(2).

NEWBY, J., recused.