State v. McLamb, 663 S.E.2d 433 (N.C. 2008). · Go Syfert
Search
State v. McLamb, 663 S.E.2d 433 (N.C. 2008). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
“we review the issue of insufficiency of an indictment under a de novo standard of review.”
29 citation events (29 in the last 25 years) across 3 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: State v. Williams (ncctapp, 2017-01-17)
Treatment trajectory · 2007 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
2007 2016 2026
Top citers, strongest first. 1 distinct citer. How cited ↗
discussed Cited as authority (quoted) State v. Williams
N.C. Ct. App. · 2017 · quote attribution · 1 verbatim quote · confidence low
we review the issue of insufficiency of an indictment under a de novo standard of review.
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
STATE of North Carolina
v.
William Roger McLAMB.
No. 489P07..
Supreme Court of North Carolina.
Jun 11, 2008.
663 S.E.2d 433
Derrick C. Mertz, Assistant Attorney General, Seth Edwards, District Attorney, for State of NC.
Published
1 passage pin-cited by 1 case
Pinpoint authority: bottom 59%
Citer courts: Court of Appeals of North Caro… (1)

Upon consideration of the petition filed by State of NC on the 5th day of October 2007 for Writ of Supersedeas of the judgment of the Court of Appeals, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the North Carolina Court of Appeals:

[*434] "Denied by order of the Court in conference, this the 11th day of June 2008."

Upon consideration of the petition filed on the 5th day of' October 2007 by State of NC in this matter for discretionary review of the decision of the North Carolina Court of Appeals pursuant to G.S. 7A-31, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the North Carolina Court of Appeals:

"Denied by order of the Court in conference, this the 11th day of June 2008."