Hartmann Bros. Mfg. Co. v. New York Interurban Water Co., 101 N.E. 1104 (NY 1913). · Go Syfert
Search
Hartmann Bros. Mfg. Co. v. New York Interurban Water Co., 101 N.E. 1104 (NY 1913). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
8 citation events across 5 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: Sharon Steel Corporation, Plaintiff-Appellant-Cross v. The Chase Manhattan Bank, N.A., and Manufacturers Hanover Trust Company, Defendants-Appellees-Cross Manufacturers Hanover Trust Company, Third-Party Plaintiff-Appellee-Cross v. Uv Industries, Inc., Third-Party Defendant-Appellant-Cross Connecticut Mutual Life Insurance Company, Intervenors-Appellees-Cross v. Sharon Steel Corporation, Plaintiff-Appellant-Cross and Uv Industries, Inc., Third-Party Defendant-Appellant-Cross Union Planters National Bank of Memphis, as Trustee, Plaintiff-Appellee-Cross v. Uv Industries, Inc. And David Finkelstein, Arthur R. Gralla, Martin Horwitz, Edwin Jacobson, Theodore W. Kheel, and Paul Kolton, as Trustees of the Uv Industries, Inc. Liquidating Trust, Defendants-Appellants-Cross and Sharon Steel Corporation, Defendant-Appellant-Cross (ca2, 1982-09-28)
Top citers, strongest first. 3 distinct citers. How cited ↗
cited Cited "see" Sharon Steel Corporation, Plaintiff-Appellant-Cross v. The Chase Manhattan Bank, N.A., and Manufacturers Hanover Trust Company, Defendants-Appellees-Cross Manufacturers Hanover Trust Company, Third-Party Plaintiff-Appellee-Cross v. Uv Industries, Inc., Third-Party Defendant-Appellant-Cross Connecticut Mutual Life Insurance Company, Intervenors-Appellees-Cross v. Sharon Steel Corporation, Plaintiff-Appellant-Cross and Uv Industries, Inc., Third-Party Defendant-Appellant-Cross Union Planters National Bank of Memphis, as Trustee, Plaintiff-Appellee-Cross v. Uv Industries, Inc. And David Finkelstein, Arthur R. Gralla, Martin Horwitz, Edwin Jacobson, Theodore W. Kheel, and Paul Kolton, as Trustees of the Uv Industries, Inc. Liquidating Trust, Defendants-Appellants-Cross and Sharon Steel Corporation, Defendant-Appellant-Cross
2d Cir. · 1982 · signal: see · confidence high
See Harnickell v. Omaha Water Co., 146 A.D. 693 , 131 N.Y.S. 489 (1st Dep't 1911), aff'd, 208 N.Y. 520 , 101 N.E. 1104 (1913). 4.
cited Cited "see" Sharon Steel Corp. v. Chase Manhattan Bank, N.A.
2d Cir. · 1982 · signal: see · confidence high
See Harnickell v. Omaha Water Co., 146 A.D. 693 , 131 N.Y.S. 489 (1st Dep’t 1911), aff’d, 208 N.Y. 520 , 101 N.E. 1104 (1913). 4.
discussed Cited "see, e.g." Thom v. New York Stock Exchange
S.D.N.Y. · 1969 · signal: see also · confidence low
See also Hawkins v. Kuhne, 153 App.Div. 216 , 137 N.Y.S. 1090 (1912), aff’d, 208 N.Y. 555 , 101 N.E. 1104 (1913); Fidler v. Murphy, 203 Misc. 51 , 113 N.Y.S.2d 388 (Sup.Ct.1952) (fingerprinting in case not provided for by law constitutes cause of action for assault).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Hartmann Bros. Manufacturing Company, Appellant,
v.
New York Interurban Water Company, Respondent, Impleaded With Others
New York Court of Appeals.
Feb 25, 1913.
101 N.E. 1104
Edwin C. Colwell and Alpheus H. Favour for appellant. Arthur E. Walradt, Charles P. Blaney and Edwin J. Tetlow for respondent.
Published

Judgment affirmed, with costs; no opinion.

Concur: Cullen, Ch. J., Gray, Werner, Chase, Collin, Cuddeback and Miller, JJ.