Matter of Thurman, 170 N.E. 164 (NY 1930). · Go Syfert
Search
Matter of Thurman, 170 N.E. 164 (NY 1930). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
22 citation events (11 in the last 25 years) across 7 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: County of Onondaga v. State of New York (nyappdiv, 2025-05-07)
Treatment trajectory · 1969 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1969 1997 2026
Top citers, strongest first. 4 distinct citers.
cited Cited "see" County of Onondaga v. State of New York
N.Y. App. Div. · 2025 · signal: see · confidence high
Taxi Assn. v State of New York , 21 NY3d 289, 301 [2013]; see Adler v Deegan , 251 NY 467, 484-491 [1929, Cardozo, J., concurring], rearg denied 252 NY 574 [1929], amended 252 NY 615 [1930]).
discussed Cited "see" Lowe v. Broward County (2×)
Fla. Dist. Ct. App. · 2000 · signal: see · confidence high
See Adler v. Deegan, 251 N.Y. 467 , 167 N.E. 705 (1929) (Cardozo, J., concurring), amended on other grounds, 252 N.Y. 615 , 170 N.E. 164 (N.Y.Ct.App.1930); Wagner, 132 A.2d at 800 .
discussed Cited "see" City of NY v. State of NY
NY · 2000 · signal: see · confidence high
The path of home rule over the years has been controversial, reflecting the "difficult problem of furthering strong local government but leaving the [S]tate just as strong to meet the problems that transcend local boundaries, interests and motivations" ( Wambat Realty Corp. v State of New York, 41 NY2d 490, 498 ; see, Matter of Town of Islip v Cuomo, 64 NY2d 50, 54-56 , quoted in Kamhi v Town of Yorktown, 74 NY2d 423, 428 ). [4] Chief Judge Cardozo's concurrence in Adler v Deegan ( 251 NY 467 , rearg denied 252 NY 574 , remittitur amended by 252 NY 615 ) set the standard for balancing State an…
discussed Cited "see" City of New York v. State
NY · 2000 · signal: see · confidence high
The path of home rule over the years has been controversial, reflecting the “difficult problem of furthering strong local government but leaving the [S]tate just as strong to meet the problems that transcend local boundaries, interests and motivations” (Wambat Realty Corp. v State of New York, 41 NY2d 490, 498 ; see, Matter of Town of lslip v Cuomo, 64 NY2d 50, 54-56 , quoted in Kamhi v Town of Yorktown, 74 NY2d 423, 428 ). 4 Chief Judge Cardozo’s concurrence in Adler v Deegan ( 251 NY 467 , rearg denied 252 NY 574, remittitur amended by 252 NY 615 ) set the standard for balancing State …
In the Matter of Israel N. Thurman Et Al., as Executors and Trustees Under the Will of David Taylor, Deceased, Respondents. Francis P. Callahan, as Special Guardian for Alexander A. Taylor Et Al., Respondents; Benjamin Taylor Et Al., Respondents; Fannie Taylor, Appellant
New York Court of Appeals.
Jan 14, 1930.
170 N.E. 164
Published

Motion for reargument denied, with ten dollars costs and necessary printing disbursements. (See 252 N. Y. 218.)