Eisert v. . Bowen, 85 N.E. 1113 (NY 1908). · Go Syfert
Search
Eisert v. . Bowen, 85 N.E. 1113 (NY 1908). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
25 citation events (1 in the last 25 years) across 9 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: State/Klamath County v. Hershey (orctapp, 2020-05-06)
Treatment trajectory · 1913 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1913 1969 2026
Top citers, strongest first. 1 distinct citer. How cited ↗
discussed Cited "see, e.g." State/Klamath County v. Hershey
Or. Ct. App. · 2020 · signal: see also · confidence low
It is a natural equity[.]”); Sleight v. Read, 1854 WL 5392 (NY Sup Ct), aff’d, 1854 WL 5754 (NY Gen Term 1854) (“On a foreclosure, the surplus moneys brought into court are subject to its jurisdiction as a court of equity[.]”); Clarke v. Southwick, 5 F Cas 981, 981 (Cir Court, Dist of Mass 1852) (“This is a bill in equity, to establish and enforce a lien on certain mills, lands, and their appurtenances[.]”); see also Occidental Realty Co. v. Palmer, 102 NYS 648, 650 , 117 AD 505, 507 (NY App Div 1907), aff’d, 192 NY 588 , 85 NE 1113 (1908) (noting that specific type of lien was f…
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Alvin Eisert, Respondent,
v.
Abner T. Bowen Et Al., Appellants, Impleaded With Others
New York Court of Appeals.
Mar 31, 1908.
85 N.E. 1113
Henry B. Johnson, Richard V. Harrington and John J. Cunneen for appellants. James M. Fisk for respondent.
Cited by 1 opinion  |  Published

Judgment affirmed, with costs ; no opinion.

Concur: Cullen, Oh. J., Cray, Haight, Vann, Werneb, Willard Bartlett and Chase, JJ.