Kramer v. News Syndicate Co., 32 N.E.2d 552 (NY 1940). · Go Syfert
Search
Kramer v. News Syndicate Co., 32 N.E.2d 552 (NY 1940). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
8 citation events across 2 distinct courts.
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Bernard Kramer, Appellant,
v.
News Syndicate Co., Inc., Respondent
New York Court of Appeals.
Dec 31, 1940.
32 N.E.2d 552
Lee Hazen, Julius M. Arnstein and Joseph Dannenberg for appellant. Stuart N. Updike and James W. Rodgers for respondent.
<italic>Per Curiam.</italic>.
Cited by 2 opinions  |  Published
Per Curiam.

The majority of the court are agreed that the question of whether the plaintiff is entitled to any damages is one of fact rather than of law. We are all agreed that there should be a new trial on the ground[*560] that the trial court erroneously admitted testimony of the witness Daniel.

The judgment of the trial court and the judgment of dismissal of the Appellate Division should be reversed and a new trial granted, with costs to the appellant to abide the event.

Lehman, Ch. J., Loughran, Finch, Rippey, Sears, Lewis and Conway, JJ., concur.

Judgments reversed, etc.