green
Positive treatment
Quoted verbatim 1×
5.1 score
G Cite
cited 2× by 1 distinct case, last quoted 1987 ·
…however, if there appears no reasonable basis for the engineer's action, if it is patently erroneous, then the courts have found the equivalent of bad faith and the contractor is not bound by the engineer's decision.
⚠ not in text
Treatment trajectory · 1981 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1981
2003
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 5 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
examined
Cited as authority (quoted)
Cities Service Co., Inc. v. Derby & Co., Inc.
(2×)
however, if there appears no reasonable basis for the engineer's action, if it is patently erroneous, then the courts have found the equivalent of bad faith and the contractor is not bound by the engineer's decision.
cited
Cited "see"
RKI Construction, LLC v. WDF Inc.
See Savin Bros., Inc. v. State, 62 A.D.2d 511, 516 (4th Dept. 1978), aff'd, 393 N.E.2d 1041 (1979).
discussed
Cited "see"
RaDec Construction Inc. v. School District No. 17
(2×)
See Savin Bros., Inc. v. State, 62 A.D.2d 511 , 405 N.Y.S.2d 516 (1978), aff’d 47 N.Y.2d 934 , 393 N.E.2d 1041 , 419 N.Y.S.2d 969 (1979).
discussed
Cited "see"
RaDEC v. SCHOOL DIST. OF DOUGLAS COUNTY
(2×)
See Savin Bros., Inc. v. State, 62 A.D.2d 511 , 405 N.Y.S.2d 516 (1978), aff'd 47 N.Y.2d 934 , 393 N.E.2d 1041 , 419 N.Y.S.2d 969 (1979).
discussed
Cited "see"
Wolff & Munier, Inc., Plaintiff-Appellant-Cross-Appellee v. The Whiting-Turner Contracting Company, Defendant-Appellee-Cross-Appellant
(2×)
See Savin Bros., Inc. v. State, 62 A.D.2d 511, 516 , 405 N.Y.S.2d 516, 519-20 (4th Dept.1978), aff'd, 47 N.Y.2d 934 , 419 N.Y.S.2d 969 , 393 N.E.2d 1041 (1979).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Savin Brothers, Inc.
v.
State of New York
v.
State of New York
Claim No. 55011.
New York Court of Appeals.
Jun 28, 1979.
393 N.E.2d 1041
APPEARANCES OF COUNSEL, Carl E. Buckley and Eugene Schaifel for appellant., Robert Abrams, Attorney-General (George M. Thorpe, Shirley Adelson Siegel and Jeremiah Jochnowitz of counsel), for respondent.
Cited by 33 opinions | Published
Citer courts: S.D. New York (2)
OPINION OF THE COURT
Order affirmed, with costs, for reasons stated in the opinion by then Presiding Justice John S. Marsh at the Appellate Division (62 AD2d 511).
Concur: Chief Judge Cooke and Judges Jasen, Gabrielli, Jones, Wachtler and Meyer. Taking no part: Judge Fuchs-berg.