green
Positive treatment
2.2 score
Top citers, strongest first. 2 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited "see"
In re the Claim of Caplan
The settlement agreement "does not 'preclude the Board from examining the factual basis for claimant’s discharge’ ” (Matter of Landau [Hudacs], 187 AD2d 841, 842 , quoting Matter of Bernet [Hartnett], 165 AD2d 957, 959 ; see, Matter of Briem [Ross], 71 AD2d 752 , affd 52 NY2d 842 ).
discussed
Cited "see"
Lefkowitz v. Arcadia Trading Co. Ltd. Defined Benefit Pension Plan
(2×)
See Davis v. Davis, 75 A.D.2d 861 , 427 N.Y.S.2d 891 (2d Dep’t 1980), affd., 52 N.Y.2d 850 , 437 N.Y.S.2d 77 , 418 N.E.2d 670 (1981) (both actions for divorce abated at the death of a spouse).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
In the Matter of the Claim of William K. Briem, Appellant. Philip Ross, as Industrial Commissioner, Respondent
New York Court of Appeals.
Jan 8, 1981.
418 N.E.2d 670
APPEARANCES OF COUNSEL, David E. Ralph for appellant., Robert Abrams, Attorney-General (Paul S. Shemin, Iris A. Steel and Shirley Adelson Siegel of counsel), for respondent.
Cited by 7 opinions | Published
OPINION OF THE COURT
Order affirmed, with costs, for reasons stated in the memorandum at the Appellate Division (71 AD2d 752).
Concur: Chief Judge Cooke and Judges Jasen, Gabrielli, Jones, Wachtler, Fuchsberg and Meyer.