Wertheim v. New York City Teachers' Ret. Sys., 448 N.E.2d 1356 (NY 1983). · Go Syfert
Search
Wertheim v. New York City Teachers' Ret. Sys., 448 N.E.2d 1356 (NY 1983). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
7 citation events across 2 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: Leveraged Leasing Administration Corp. v. PacifiCorp Capital, Inc. (ca2, 1996-06-24)
Top citers, strongest first. 2 distinct citers. How cited ↗
discussed Cited "see" Leveraged Leasing Administration Corp. v. PacifiCorp Capital, Inc. (2×)
2d Cir. · 1996 · signal: see · confidence high
See Grassi v. Tatavito Homes, Inc., 90 A.D.2d 479, 480 , 454 N.Y.S.2d 471, 473 (2d Dep’t 1982) (holding that upon the breach of a sale of real estate, a buyer has a right to rescission as well as loss-of-bargain damages), aff'd, 58 N.Y.2d 1038 , 462 N.Y.S.2d 445 , 448 N.E.2d 1356 (1983); Wright v. Barnes, 541 So.2d 977, 979 (La.Ct.App.1989) (“The sale of a thing belonging to another is not absolutely null but only relatively so, and such nullity is in the interest of the purchaser.”).
discussed Cited "see" Leveraged Leasing Administration Corp. v. Pacificorp Capital, Inc. (2×)
2d Cir. · 1996 · signal: see · confidence high
See Grassi v. Tatavito Homes, Inc., 90 A.D.2d 479, 480 , 454 N.Y.S.2d 471, 473 (2d Dep't 1982) (holding that upon the breach of a sale of real estate, a buyer has a right to rescission as well as loss-of-bargain damages), aff'd, 58 N.Y.2d 1038 , 462 N.Y.S.2d 445 , 448 N.E.2d 1356 (1983); Wright v. Barnes, 541 So.2d 977, 979 (La.Ct.App.1989) ("The sale of a thing belonging to another is not absolutely null but only relatively so, and such nullity is in the interest of the purchaser.").
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
In the Matter of Carol S. Wertheim, Individually and on Behalf of All Other Persons Similarly Situated
v.
New York City Teachers' Retirement System
New York Court of Appeals.
Mar 24, 1983.
448 N.E.2d 1356
APPEARANCES OF COUNSEL, A. Thomas Levin for appellant., Frederick A. O. Schwarz, Jr., Corporation Counsel (Irving Genn of counsel), for respondent.
Published

[*1046] OPINION OF THE COURT

On review of submissions pursuant to rule 500.2 (b) of the Rules of the Court of Appeals (22 NYCRR 500.2 [g]), order affirmed, with costs, for the reasons stated in the memorandum at the Appellate Division (91 AD2d 514).

Concur: Chief Judge Cooke and Judges Jasen, Jones, Wachtler, Fuchsberg, Meyer and Simons.