In re the Est. of Whelan, 464 N.E.2d 988 (NY 1984). · Go Syfert
Search
In re the Est. of Whelan, 464 N.E.2d 988 (NY 1984). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
13 citation events (6 in the last 25 years) across 5 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: Building Trades Employers' Educational Association v. Mcgowan (ca2, 2002-11-20)
Top citers, strongest first. 2 distinct citers. How cited ↗
discussed Cited "see, e.g." Building Trades Employers' Educational Association v. Mcgowan (2×)
2d Cir. · 2002 · signal: see, e.g. · confidence low
See, e.g., Tommy & Tina, Inc. v. Dep't of Consumer Affairs, 95 A.D.2d 724, 724 , 464 N.Y.S.2d 132 (1st Dep't 1983), aff'd, 62 N.Y.2d 671 , 476 N.Y.S.2d 290 , 464 N.E.2d 988 (1984).
discussed Cited "see, e.g." American Amusement MacHine Ass'n v. Kendrick (2×)
S.D. Ind. · 2000 · signal: see also · confidence low
The court cautioned: “We recognize that in the future video games which contain sufficient communicative and expressive elements may be created.” Marshfield Family Skateland, 450 N.E.2d at 609-10 ; see also Tommy & Tina Inc. v. Department of Consumer Affairs, 117 Misc.2d 415 , 459 N.Y.S.2d 220, 226-27 (N.Y.Sup.Ct.1983) (finding that video games considered in the case were not speech but leaving open the possibility that “games ... of a different nature” may be entitled to First Amendment protection), aff'd, 95 A.D.2d 724 , 464 N.Y.S.2d 132 (N.Y.App.Div.1983), aff'd mem., 62 N.Y.2d 671 …
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
In the Matter of the Estate of Julia Whelan, Muriel Schauff, Respondents Attorney-General of the State of New York
New York Court of Appeals.
May 1, 1984.
464 N.E.2d 988
Robert Abrams, Attorney-General {Julia C. Tobey, Peter H. Schiff and Jonathan J. Silbermann of counsel), for appellant., John B. Amrod and Michael J. Creighton for respondents.
Cooke, Jasen, Jones, Kaye, Meyer, Simons, Wachtler.
Cited by 2 opinions  |  Published

OPINION OF THE COURT

Order affirmed, with costs payable out of the estate to all parties appearing separately and filing separate briefs, for reasons stated in the memorandum at the Appellate Division (93 AD2d 891).

Concur: Chief Judge Cooke and Judges Jasen, Jones, Wachtler, Meyer, Simons and Kaye.