green
Positive treatment
3.9 score
Top citers, strongest first. 2 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
examined
Cited "see, e.g."
National Awareness Foundation v. Robert Abrams
(3×)
Such distinctions misinterpret the purposes underlying registration requirements, which, according to New York caselaw, "regulate ... the operation of organizations which ... violate the law by failing to register or by engaging in what is tantamount to fraudulent solicitation." Green v. Javits, 1 A.D.2d 342, 344 , 149 N.Y.S.2d 854, 856 (1st Dep't 1956); see also Viguerie Co. v. Paterson, 94 A.D.2d 672, 673 , 462 N.Y.S.2d 669, 670 (1st Dep't 1983) ("The Secretary of State is charged by law with the enforcement of the provisions of Article 7-A ... in the exercise of the State's police power, to…
examined
Cited "see, e.g."
National Awareness Foundation v. Abrams
(3×)
Such distinctions misinterpret the purposes underlying registration requirements, which, according to New York case-law, “regulate ... the operation of organizations which ... violate the law by failing to register or by engaging in what is tantamount to fraudulent solicitation.” Green v. Javits, 1 A.D.2d 342, 344 , 149 N.Y.S.2d 854, 856 (1st Dep’t 1956); see also Viguerie Co. v. Paterson, 94 A.D.2d 672, 673 , 462 N.Y.S.2d 669, 670 (1st Dep’t 1983) (“The Secretary of State is charged by law with the enforcement of the provisions of Article 7-A ... in the exercise of the State’s pol…
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
In the Matter of the Viguerie Company
v.
Basil A. Paterson, as Secretary of State of the State of New York
v.
Basil A. Paterson, as Secretary of State of the State of New York
New York Court of Appeals.
Jun 7, 1984.
467 N.E.2d 528
Stuart A. Jackson, Ronald L. Mayers and Thadd A. Blizzard for appellant., Robert Abrams, Attorney-General (.Ronald Cohen, Peter H. Schiff and Daniel L. Kurtz of counsel), for respondent.
Cooke, Jasen, Jones, Kaye, Meyer, Simons, Wachtler.
Cited by 2 opinions | Published
OPINION OF THE COURT
Order affirmed, with costs, for the reasons stated in the memorandum at the Appellate Division (94 AD2d 672), to which we add, the inhibiting effect of which petitioner complains is precisely what the Legislature intended and is well within its police power.
Concur: Chief Judge Cooke and Judges Jasen, Jones, Wachtler, Meyer, Simons and Kaye.