green
Positive treatment
3.9 score
Treatment trajectory · 1986 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1986
2006
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 3 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited as authority (rule)
Capruso v. Village of Kings Point
For their part, plaintiffs and the State cite our decision in Matter of Ackerman v Steisel ( 66 NY2d 833, 835 [1985], affg for reasons stated below 104 AD2d 940 [2d Dept 1984]), in which we affirmed an order of the Appellate Division directing the New York City Departments of Sanitation and Transportation to remove decades-old public works facilities from parkland in Queens.
examined
Cited "see, e.g."
Hotel Employees & Restaurant Employees Union, Local 100 Of New York, N.Y. & Vicinity, Afl-Cio v. City Of New York Department Of Parks & Recreation
(3×)
We express no opinion on whether a dedicated public park must necessarily qualify as a traditional public forum, without regard to the context of its location and use. 10 We conclude, however, that while there is no dispute that the Plaza is a public place or that it is owned by the City and falls within the jurisdiction of the Parks Department, the Union has not established that the Plaza has been designated as a public park by the city. 33 "[A] parcel of property may become a park by express provisions in a deed or legislative enactment or by implied acts, such as the continued use of the pa…
examined
Cited "see, e.g."
Hotel Employees & Restaurant Employees Union, Local 100 v. City of New York Department of Parks & Recreation
(3×)
We express no opinion on whether a dedicated public park must necessarily qualify as a traditional public forum, without regard to the context of its location and use. 10 We conclude, however, that while • there is no dispute that the Plaza is a public place or that it is owned by the City and falls within the jurisdiction of the Parks Department, the Union has not established that the Plaza has been designated as a public park by the city. “[A] parcel of property may become a park by express provisions in a deed or legislative enactment or by implied acts, such as the continued use of the…
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
In the Matter of Gary L. Ackerman
v.
Norman Steisel, as Sanitation Commissioner of the City of New York
v.
Norman Steisel, as Sanitation Commissioner of the City of New York
New York Court of Appeals.
Nov 14, 1985.
489 N.E.2d 251
APPEARANCES OF COUNSEL, Frederick A. O. Schwarz, Jr., Corporation Counsel (Fay Leoussis and Leonard Koerner of counsel), for appellants., Nicholas G. Garaufis and Alan M. Block for respondents.
Cited by 22 opinions | Published
OPINION OF THE COURT
Order affirmed, with costs, for the reasons stated in the memorandum at the Appellate Division (104 AD2d 940; see also, White v Adler, 289 NY 34, 44).
Concur: Chief Judge Wachtler and Judges Jasen, Meyer, Simons, Kaye and Alexander. Taking no part: Judge Titone.