green
Positive treatment
29.4 score
Treatment trajectory · 1991 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1991
2008
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 31 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
cited
Cited as authority (rule)
97th St. Commons, LLC v. Ortega
Co. , 75 NY2d 825, 826 [1990]; Liddle, Robinson & Shoemaker v. Shoemaker , 309 AD2d 688, 691 [1st Dept. 2003]).
cited
Cited as authority (rule)
97th St. Commons, LLC v. Ortega
Co. , 75 NY2d 825, 826 [1990]; Liddle, Robinson & Shoemaker v. Shoemaker , 309 AD2d 688, 691 [1st Dept. 2003]).
cited
Cited as authority (rule)
321-323-325 W. 42nd St. LLC v. McMahan
Co. , 75 NY2d 825, 826 (1990), Liddle, Robinson & Shoemaker v. Shoemaker , 309 AD2d 688, 691 (1st Dept. 2003).
cited
Cited as authority (rule)
321-323-325 W. 42nd St. LLC v. McMahan
Co. , 75 NY2d 825, 826 (1990), Liddle, Robinson & Shoemaker v. Shoemaker , 309 AD2d 688, 691 (1st Dept. 2003).
cited
Cited as authority (rule)
Matter of Theopheles v. County of Rensselaer
Co. , 75 NY2d 825, 826 [1990]).
discussed
Cited as authority (rule)
Bryant v. Gulnick
Co. , 75 NY2d 825, 826 [1990]; Malloy v Trombley , 50 NY2d at 52 ; Peterkin v Episcopal Social Servs. of N.Y., Inc. , 24 AD3d 306, 308 [1st Dept [*3]2005]; cf. Tydings v Greenfield, Stein & Senior, LLP , 11 NY3d 195, 199-200 [2008]).
cited
Cited as authority (rule)
Lu v. Gamba
Co. , 75 NY2d 825, 826 [1990]; see Malloy v Trombley , 50 NY2d 46, 50-53 [1980]).
discussed
Cited as authority (rule)
In re Doe
Co., 75 NY2d 825, 826 [1990].) “Generally, for ‘a question to have been actually litigated’ so as to satisfy the identity requirement, it ‘must have been properly raised by the pleadings or otherwise placed in issue and actually determined in the prior proceeding.’ ” (D’Arata v New York Cent.
discussed
Cited as authority (rule)
Greens at Half Hollow Home Owners Assn., Inc. v. Greens Golf Club, LLC
Co., 75 NY2d 825, 826 [1990]; Green v Santa Fe Indus., 70 NY2d 244, 253-254 [1987]), and that the HOA has standing to seek this declaratory relief on behalf of its members who did not purchase their units directly from the developer (see generally Society of Plastics Indus., v County of Suffolk, 77 NY2d 761, 775 [1991]).
cited
Cited as authority (rule)
Crystal Clear Development, LLC v. Devon Architects of New York, P.C.
Co., 75 NY2d 825, 826 [1990]; see Motors Ins.
cited
Cited as authority (rule)
Crystal Clear Development, LLC v. Devon Architects of New York, P.C.
Co., 75 NY2d 825, 826 [1990]; see Motors Ins.
cited
Cited as authority (rule)
Board of Managers v. Cooper
Co., 75 NY2d 825, 826 [1990]; see also Pinnacle Consultants v Leucadia Natl.
cited
Cited as authority (rule)
United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co. v. American Re-Insurance
Co., 75 NY2d 825, 826 [1990]).
cited
Cited as authority (rule)
Thyroff v. Nationwide Mutual Insurance
Co., 75 NY2d 825, 826 [1990]; see B.F.
discussed
Cited as authority (rule)
Zayatz v. Collins
(2×)
Co., 75 NY2d 825, 826 [1990]; see D'Arata, 76 NY2d at 666-667 ; Matter of Halyalkar v Board of Regents of State of N.Y., 72 NY2d 261, 268 [1988]).
cited
Cited as authority (rule)
Motors Insurance v. Mautone
Co., 75 NY2d 825, 826 [1990]; see North Shore-Long Is.
cited
Cited as authority (rule)
North Shore-Long Island Jewish Health System, Inc. v. Aetna US Healthcare, Inc.
Co., 75 NY2d 825, 826 [1990]).
cited
Cited as authority (rule)
Spectrum Health Continuing Care Group v. Anna Marie Bowling Irrevocable Trust Dated June 27, 2002
Ross, 551 N.E.2d at 1237.
cited
Cited as authority (rule)
Church v. New York State Thruway Authority
Co., 75 NY2d 825, 826 [1990]).
cited
Cited as authority (rule)
Liddle, Robinson & Shoemaker v. Shoemaker
Co., 75 NY2d 825, 826 [1990]).
cited
Cited as authority (rule)
Liddle, Robinson & Shoemaker v. Shoemaker
Co., 75 NY2d 825, 826 [1990]).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Stanley Ross, Appellant,
v.
Medical Liability Mutual Insurance Company, Respondent
v.
Medical Liability Mutual Insurance Company, Respondent
New York Court of Appeals.
Feb 8, 1990.
551 N.E.2d 1237
APPEARANCES OF COUNSEL, Frank A. Weg for appellant., Michael A. Ellenberg for respondent.
Cited by 49 opinions | Published
OPINION OF THE COURT
On review of submissions pursuant to section 500.4 of the Rules of the Court of Appeals (22 NYCRR 500.4), order affirmed, with costs, for the reasons stated in the memorandum at the Appellate Division (150 AD2d 187). To the extent that appellant has preserved his argument for our review, we add only that preclusive effect may be given to issues that were actually litigated, squarely addressed and specifically decided (compare, Malloy v Trombley, 50 NY2d 46, 50-53, with O’Connor v G & R Packing Co., 53 NY2d 278, 282-284).
Concur: Chief Judge Wachtler and Judges Simons, Kaye, Alexander, Titone, Hancock, Jr., and Bellacosa.