Dressler v. Dressler, 612 N.E.2d 329 (Ohio 1993). · Go Syfert
Search
Dressler v. Dressler, 612 N.E.2d 329 (Ohio 1993). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
3 citation events across 2 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: Skalka v. Fernald Environmental Restoration Management Corp. (ca6, 1999-05-19)
Top citers, strongest first. 2 distinct citers. How cited ↗
discussed Cited "see" Skalka v. Fernald Environmental Restoration Management Corp.
6th Cir. · 1999 · signal: see · confidence high
See Rudy v. Loral Defense Sys., 85 Ohio App.3d 148 , 619 N.E.2d 449, 452 (Ohio Ct.App.), cause dismissed, 66 Ohio St.3d 1478 , 612 N.E.2d 329 (Ohio 1993); Bartlett v. Daniel Drake Mem’l Hosp., 75 Ohio App.3d 334 , 599 N.E.2d 403, 406 (Ohio Ct.App.1991).
discussed Cited "see" Robert J. Skalka v. Fernald Environmental Restoration Management Corporation
6th Cir. · 1999 · signal: see · confidence high
See Rudy v. Loral Defense Sys., 85 Ohio App.3d 148 , 619 N.E.2d 449, 452 (Ohio Ct.App.), cause dismissed, 66 Ohio St.3d 1478 , 612 N.E.2d 329 (Ohio 1993); Bartlett v. Daniel Drake Mem'l Hosp., 75 Ohio App.3d 334 , 599 N.E.2d 403, 406 (Ohio Ct.App.1991).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Dressler
v.
Dressler
92-2629.
Ohio Supreme Court.
May 7, 1993.
612 N.E.2d 329
Published

Portage County, No. 91-P-2312. This cause is pending before the court on the filing of a motion for an order directing the Court of Appeals for Portage County to certify its record. Appellant’s request for extension of time to file a memorandum in support of jurisdiction was denied by this court on January 29,1993. It appears from the records of this court that appellant has not filed a memorandum in support of jurisdiction in compliance with the Rules of Practice of the Supreme Court and therefore has failed to prosecute this cause with the requisite diligence. Upon consideration thereof,

IT IS ORDERED by the court that this cause be, and hereby is, dismissed sua sponte.