green
Positive treatment
3.3 score
Treatment trajectory · 1993 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1993
2009
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 3 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
examined
Cited "see"
Molinari v. Bloomberg
(3×)
See Matter of Roth v. Cuevas, 82 N.Y.2d 791 , 624 N.E.2d 689 , 604 N.Y.S.2d 551 (1993).
cited
Cited "see"
Opn. No.
See Roth v. Cuevas , 158 Misc. 2d 238 (Sup.Ct.), aff'd , 197 A.D.2d 369 (1 st Dep't), aff'd for reasons stated at Supreme Court , 82 N.Y.2d 791 (1993); see also Op. Att'y Gen.
discussed
Cited "see"
Schrader v. Cuevas
(2×)
also: Cited "see, e.g."
(Supra, at 64-65; see, Municipal Home Rule Law § 37 [5].)” (Matter of Roth v Cuevas, 158 Misc 2d 238, 241 [Sup Ct, NY County], affd 197 AD2d 369 [1st Dept], affd 82 NY2d 791 [1993].) If the petition meets all the requirements of law the City Council has a period of two months to adopt the initiative without change or, if it requires a referendum, to submit it without change to the voters (Municipal Home Rule Law § 37 [7]).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
In the Matter of Allen H. Roth, Individually and on Behalf of All Signers of a Petition Filed Pursuant to Section 37 of the Municipal Home Rule Law, and as Secretary of New Yorkers for Term Limits, Inc., Respondent,
v.
Carlos Cuevas, as City Clerk of the City of New York, et al., Appellants.
v.
Carlos Cuevas, as City Clerk of the City of New York, et al., Appellants.
New York Court of Appeals.
Oct 19, 1993.
Cited by 6 opinions | Published
O. Peter Sherwood, Corporation Counsel of New York City (Linda H. Young, Jonathan Pines and Pamela Seider Dolgow of counsel), for appellants.
Townley & Updike, New York City (Douglas C. Fairhurst, Steven I. Himelstein and Zvi N. Raskin of counsel), for respondent.
Charles S. Turner, County Attorney of Monroe County, Rochester (Raymond J. Lum of counsel), for County of Monroe, amicus curiae.
Concur: Chief Judge KAYE and Judges SIMONS, TITONE, HANCOCK, JR., BELLACOSA, SMITH and LEVINE.
Order affirmed, without costs, for reasons stated in the[*794] opinion by Justice Martin Evans at Supreme Court (158 Misc 2d 238).