State v. Roberts, 655 N.E.2d 184 (Ohio 1995). · Go Syfert
Search
State v. Roberts, 655 N.E.2d 184 (Ohio 1995). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
19 citation events (12 in the last 25 years) across 7 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: Graham v. Allen Cty. Sheriff's Office, Unpublished Decision (8-14-2006) (ohioctapp, 2006-08-14)
Top citers, strongest first. 4 distinct citers. How cited ↗
discussed Cited "see" Graham v. Allen Cty. Sheriff's Office, Unpublished Decision (8-14-2006) (2×)
Ohio Ct. App. · 2006 · signal: see · confidence high
See generally Woodman v. Tubbs Jones (1995), 103 Ohio App.3d 577 , 582 , 660 N.E.2d 520 , discretionary appeal denied (1995), 74 Ohio St.3d 1405 , 655 N.E.2d 184 (internal citation omitted).
discussed Cited "see" Sheets v. Sasfy, Unpublished Decision (1-26-1999)
Ohio Ct. App. · 1999 · signal: see · confidence high
See DLZ Corp. v. Jones (Nov. 12, 1996), Franklin App. No. 96APE05-575, unreported (1996 Opinions 4375, 4381), citing Woodman v. Tubbs Jones (1995), 103 Ohio App.3d 577 , 582 , discretionary appeal not allowed in (1995), 74 Ohio St.3d 1405 .
discussed Cited "see" City of Cleveland Heights v. Murphy
Oh. Muni. Ct., Cleveland · 1995 · signal: see · confidence high
See State v. Gustafson, supra (holding that the sanctions imposed pursuant to an ALS were punitive in nature), and State v. Miller (May 12, 1995), Auglaize App. No. 2-94-32, unreported, 1995 WL 275770 (holding that “[a]n administrative license suspension is remedial in nature and does not constitute punishment under the Double Jeopardy Clause”), discretionary appeal allowed in (1995), 74 Ohio St.3d 1405 , 655 N.E.2d 185 .
discussed Cited "see, e.g." Knutson v. Sioux Tools, Inc.
N.D. Iowa · 1998 · signal: see, e.g. · confidence low
See, e.g., Daniels v. Thistledown Racing Club, Inc., 103 Ohio App.3d 281 , 659 N.E.2d 346, 348 (1995) (in a case in which a horse trainer was raped at the racing club, the court held that the statutory duty of an employer to furnish employment which is *1124 safe for the employee and to do everything else reasonably necessary to protect the life, health, safety, and welfare of the employee, “is no more than a codification of the common-law duty” of an owner or occupier of premises to invitees, and the statute was applicable to the plaintiff), dismissed, appeal not allowed, 74 Ohio St.3d 14…
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
State
v.
Roberts
95-1220.
Ohio Supreme Court.
Oct 4, 1995.
655 N.E.2d 184
County, Douglas, Hold, Pfeifer, Resnick, Sweeney, Williams.
Published

Ross County, No. 94CA2020.

Resnick, J., would also hold this cause for the decision in 95-880, State v. Williams, Athens County, No. 94CA1626. Douglas, F.E. Sweeney and Pfeifer, JJ., dissent.