State v. Hochhausler, 655 N.E.2d 741 (Ohio 1995). · Go Syfert
Search
State v. Hochhausler, 655 N.E.2d 741 (Ohio 1995). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
6 citation events (1 in the last 25 years) across 3 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: Erik Conte v. General Housewares Corporation, Dayton Power & Light Company (ca6, 2000-06-14)
Top citers, strongest first. 2 distinct citers. How cited ↗
discussed Cited "see" Erik Conte v. General Housewares Corporation, Dayton Power & Light Company
6th Cir. · 2000 · signal: see · confidence high
See id. at 1361 (holding that the defendants' reliance on "faulty defenses" could not constitute a good faith, objectively reasonable belief that they were not liable). 14 Furthermore, DP&L's argument that it could have had a reasonable belief that it was not liable because the factual issues were strongly disputed, see Cooper v. Metal Sales Manufacturing Corp., 660 N.E.2d 1245, 1255-56 (Ohio Ct. App.), appeal not allowed, 655 N.E.2d 741 (Ohio 1995); Worrell v. Multipress, Inc., 543 N.E.2d 1277, 1285 (Ohio 1989), does not carry the day.
discussed Cited "see" National City Bank v. Plechaty (In Re Plechaty) (2×)
6th Cir. BAP · 1997 · signal: see · confidence high
See National City Bank v. Plechaty Cos., 104 Ohio App.3d 109 , 661 N.E.2d 227 , appeal denied, 74 Ohio St.3d 1422 , 655 N.E.2d 741 (1995).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
State
v.
Hochhausler
95-1365.
Ohio Supreme Court.
Oct 18, 1995.
655 N.E.2d 741
Resnick.
Published

Warren County, Nos. CA93-12-104 and CA93-12-105.

Resnick, J., dissents.