green
Positive treatment
6.3 score
Treatment trajectory · 2005 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
2005
2015
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 9 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
cited
Cited as authority (rule)
Besser v. Walsh; Phillips v. Artus; Portalatin v. Graham; Morris v. Artus; Washington v. Poole 1
People v. Morris, 837 N.E.2d 744 13 (N.Y. 2005). 14 Morris subsequently petitioned for a writ of habeas corpus 15 pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254 .
discussed
Cited "see"
People v. Vaughan
Here, the visual observation of the stains on the shirt by the police "did not constitute an intrusion into a constitutionally protected area" ( People v Thomas , 188 AD2d 569, 571 [2d Dept 1992], lv denied 81 NY2d 1021 [1993]; see People v Loomis , 17 AD3d 1019 , 1020-1021 [4th Dept 2005], lv denied 5 NY3d 830 [2005]; see also People v Johnson , 133 AD3d 1309 , 1310-1311 [4th Dept 2015], lv denied 27 NY3d 1000 [2016]).
discussed
Cited "see"
People v. Butkiewicz
Common authority is not to be construed "in any narrow property sense, but 'rather on mutual use of the property by persons generally having joint access or control for most purposes, so that it is reasonable to recognize that any of such persons has the right to permit the inspection in his [or her] own right and that the others have assumed the risk that one of their number might permit the common area to be searched'" ( People v Gonzalez , 88 NY2d at 293 [emphasis and brackets omitted], quoting United States v Matlock , 415 US at 171 n 7; see People v Loomis , 17 AD3d 1019, 1020 [2005], lv …
discussed
Cited "see"
JOHNSON, ROBERT E., PEOPLE v
Second, there had to have been an exigent circumstance of sufficient magnitude to justify immediate seizure without resort to a warrant” (People v Thomas, 188 AD2d 569, 571 , lv denied 81 NY2d 1021 ; see People v Loomis, 17 AD3d 1019 , 1020- 1021, lv denied 5 NY3d 830 ).
discussed
Cited "see"
People v. Johnson
Second, there had to have been an exigent circumstance of sufficient magnitude to justify immediate seizure without resort to a warrant” (People v Thomas, 188 AD2d 569, 571 [1992], lv denied 81 NY2d 1021 [1993]; see People v Loomis, 17 AD3d 1019, 1020-1021 [2005], lv denied 5 NY3d 830 [2005]).
discussed
Cited "see"
People v. Johnson
Second, there had to have been an exigent circumstance of sufficient magnitude to justify immediate seizure without resort to a warrant” (People v Thomas, 188 AD2d 569, 571 [1992], lv denied 81 NY2d 1021 [1993]; see People v Loomis, 17 AD3d 1019, 1020-1021 [2005], lv denied 5 NY3d 830 [2005]).
discussed
Cited "see"
People v. Matthews
There is no requirement that the fill-in photographs depict people “nearly identical [to defendant’s photograph]” (People v Chipp, 75 NY2d at 336 ; see People v Lind, 20 AD3d 765, 767 [2005], lv denied 5 NY3d 830 [2005]).
discussed
Cited "see"
People v. Matthews
There is no requirement that the fill-in photographs depict people “nearly identical [to defendant’s photograph]” (People v Chipp, 75 NY2d at 336 ; see People v Lind, 20 AD3d 765, 767 [2005], lv denied 5 NY3d 830 [2005]).
discussed
Cited "see"
People v. Waldriff
Viewing the jury charge “as a whole against the background of the evidence produced at the trial” (People v Andujas, 79 NY2d 113, 118 [1992]; see People v McDaniels, 19 AD3d 1071 [2005], lv denied 5 NY3d 830 [2005]), we conclude that the charge was proper (see People v Coleman, 70 NY2d 817, 819 [1987]; People v Jones, 8 AD3d 1024 [2004], lv denied 3 NY3d 676 [2004]; cf. People v Murphy, 188 AD2d 1061 [1992]).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
PEOPLE
v.
McNEIL.
v.
McNEIL.
New York Court of Appeals.
Sep 16, 2005.
Published
Application in criminal case for leave to appeal denied. (Read, J.)