green
Positive treatment
3.8 score
Treatment trajectory · 2005 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
2005
2015
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 5 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited "see"
People v. Anthony
In order for the moving party to satisfy its burden at step one, it must “show[ ] that the facts and circumstances of the voir dire raise an inference that the other party excused one or more jurors for an impermissible reason” (People v Henderson, 305 AD2d 940, 940 [2003] [internal quotation marks and citations omitted], lv denied 100 NY2d 582 [2003]; see People v Skervin, 13 AD3d 661, 662 [2004], lv denied 5 NY3d 833 [2005]).
discussed
Cited "see"
People v. Thornton
Defendant was capable of obtaining the information in the unfounded report on his own (see Social Services Law § 422 [5] [a] [iv]; [7]) and, inasmuch as the People cannot be faulted for failing to turn over material outside of their “custody, possession, or control,” there was no Brady violation (People v Garrett, 23 NY3d 878, 886 [2014]; see People v Terry, 19 AD3d 1039, 1039-1040 [2005], lv denied 5 NY3d 833 [2005]).
discussed
Cited "see"
People v. Johnson
Defendant “did not establish a serious complaint concerning defense counsel’s representation and thus did not suggest a serious possibility of good cause for substitution [of counsel]” (People v Randle [appeal No. 2], 21 AD3d 1341, 1341 [2005], lv denied 6 NY3d 757 [2005] [internal quotation marks omitted]; see People v Thomas, 19 AD3d 1037 [2005], lv denied 5 NY3d 833 [2005]).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
People v. Davis
Although defendant’s contentions concerning the validity of the orders of protection issued at sentencing survive his waiver of the right to appeal in this case (see People v Russell, 120 AD3d 1594, 1594 [2014], lv denied 24 NY3d 1046 [2014]; see also People v Victor, 20 AD3d 927, 928 [2005], lv denied 5 NY3d 833 [2005], denied upon reconsideration 5 NY3d 885 [2005]), he did not preserve those contentions for our review by challenging the issuance of the orders of protection (see People v Nieves, 2 NY3d 310, 315-317 [2004]; People v Smith, 122 AD3d 1420 , 1421 [2014], lv denied 25 NY3d 1172 …
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
People v. Crowley
While defects in the duration of orders of protection issued subsequent to the plea would typically survive an appeal waiver (see People v Warren, 280 AD2d 75, 77 [2001]; see also People v Victor, 20 AD3d 927, 928 [2005], lv denied 5 NY3d 833 [2005]; People v Holmes, 294 AD2d 871, 872 [2002], lv denied 98 NY2d 730 [2002]; see e.g.
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
PEOPLE
v.
SPAULDING.
v.
SPAULDING.
New York Court of Appeals.
Sep 8, 2005.
Published
Application in criminal cases for leave to appeal denied reconsideration. (Graffeo, J.)