green
Positive treatment
3.6 score
Top citers, strongest first. 3 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited "see"
State v. R Atencio
See State 4 v. O’Neal, 2008-NMCA-022, ¶ 22 , 143 N.M. 437 , 176 P.3d 1169 (holding that 5 erroneous admission of evidence of a defendant’s notice of alibi was harmless when 6 the defendant testified regarding his alibi defense), cert. denied, 2008-NMCERT-002 , 7 143 N.M. 665 , 180 P.3d 672 . 8 Defendant asserts that the error somehow prejudiced his defense by forcing him 9 to commit to testifying.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
State v. A Turnbull-Phillips
See State v. Varela, 2 1999-NMSC-045, ¶ 25 , 128 N.M. 454 , 993 P.2d 1280 ; Rule 12-216(A) NMRA 3 (requiring that “it must appear that a ruling or decision by the district court was fairly 4 invoked” in order to preserve a question for review); see also State v. Granillo- 5 Macias, 2008-NMCA-021, ¶ 11 , 143 N.M. 455 , 176 P.3d 1187 (holding that the 6 defendant’s argument on appeal was not properly preserved where the defendant made 7 no mention of compliance with NHTSA requirements or standards and cited to no 8 case law on those issues), cert. denied, 2008-NMCERT-002 , 143 N.M. 665 ,…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
State v. Rivera
Instead, we explained that “[t]he protections afforded by the Confrontation Clause do not extend to preliminary questions of fact.” Id. ¶ 25; see also State v. Granillo-Macias, 2008-NMCA-021 , 143 N.M. 455 , 176 P.3d 1187 , cert. denied, 2008-NMCERT-002 , 143 N.M. 665 , 180 P.3d 672 (“[Bjeeause Defendant seeks only to cross-examine on preliminary questions of fact, the Confrontation Clause offers Defendant no protection.”). {13} Defendant does not point to any persuasive authority that would cause us to reverse our recent holding in Martinez, filed approximately one month before the C…
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
JOCHEM
v.
MOYA.
v.
MOYA.
30,884 (12-501).
New Mexico Supreme Court.
Feb 7, 2008.
Published
Denials of Certiorari.