green
Positive treatment
10.0 score
Treatment trajectory · 2010 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
2010
2018
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 12 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited "see"
State v. Jimenez
State v. Portillo, 2011-NMCA-079, ¶¶ 11, 32 , __ N.M. ___, 11 ___ P.3d ___, cert. denied, 2011-NMCERT-006 , ___ N.M. ___, ___ P.3d ___; see 12 State v. Sewell, 2009-NMSC-033, ¶ 16 , 146 N.M. 428 , 211 P.3d 885 (explaining that 13 a defendant has “standing to object to a seizure from a third person which occurred 14 as a result of the exploitation of [the d]efendant’s own unlawful detention.” 15 (alteration, internal quotation marks, and citation omitted)), cert. denied, 2010- 16 NMCERT-001, 147 N.M. 673 , 227 P.3d 1055 .
discussed
Cited "see"
State v. Ramos
The Legislature knows 6 how to include the word “knowingly.” See, e.g., NMSA 1978, § 30-3A-3(A) (2009) 7 (stating that “[s]talking consists of knowingly pursuing a pattern of conduct”); see 8 also State v. Wilson, 2010-NMCA-018, ¶ 12 , 147 N.M. 706 , 228 P.3d 490 (holding 9 that use of the term “knowingly” in NMSA 1978, Section 30-31-20(B), (C) (2006), 10 required specific knowledge that the drug trafficking would occur within a drug-free 11 school zone), cert. denied, 2010-NMCERT-001 , 147 N.M. 673 , 227 P.3d 1055 .
discussed
Cited "see"
State v. Montoya
See State v. Wilson, 2010-NMCA-018, ¶ 29 , 147 N.M. 706 , 228 P.3d 490 (stating that delay of five months beyond the guideline for a simple case was not so extraordinary or protracted as to compel weighing the length of delay factor against the state more than slightly), cert, denied, 2010-NMCERT-001 , 147 N.M. 673 , 227 P.3d 1055 . c.
discussed
Cited "see"
Agua Fria Save the Open Space Ass'n v. Rowe
See Heltman v. Catanach, 2010-NMCA-016, ¶ 6 , 148 N.M. 67 , 229 P.3d 1239 (holding that the termination of a restrictive covenant “by release or agreement is based on fundamental principles of contract law” (internal quotation marks and citation omitted)), cert. denied, 2010-NMCERT-001 , 147 N.M. 673 , 227 P.3d 1055 ; cf. City of Rio Rancho v. AMREP Sw., Inc., 2010-NMCA-075, ¶¶ 17-18 , 148 N.M. 542 , 238 P.3d 911 (applying contract law to the construction of a deed and plat), cert. granted, 2010-NMCERT-008 , 148 N.M. 943 , 242 P.3d 1289 . {20} In C.R.
discussed
Cited "see"
State v. Richart
See State v. Wilson, 2010-NMCA-018, ¶ 29 , 147 N.M. 706 , 228 9 P.3d 490 (discussing delay stretching five months beyond the bare minimum and 10 concluding that such delay weighs only slightly against the State), cert. denied, 11 2010-NMCERT-001 , 147 N.M. 673 , 227 P.3d 1055 . 12 Reasons for the Delay 13 We next evaluate the reasons “the government assigns to justify the delay.” Id. 14 ¶ 30 (internal quotation marks and citation omitted). “[T]he reasons for a period of 15 the delay may either heighten or temper the prejudice to the defendant caused by the 16 length of the delay.” Id…
discussed
Cited "see"
Tri-State Generation & Transmission Ass'n v. D'Antonio
See State v. Wilson, 2010-NMCA-018, ¶ 9 , 147 N.M. 706 , 228 P.3d 490 (filed 2009) (“[S]tatute[s] must be read as a whole, construing each section so as to produce a harmonious whole.”), cert. denied, 2010-NMCERT-001 , 147 N.M. 673 , 227 P.3d 1055 ; City of Deming v. Deming Firefighters Local 4521, 2007-NMCA-069, ¶ 23 , 141 N.M. 686 , 160 P.3d 595 (“We ... do not give effect to legislative intent by reading a statute in a way that would render it meaningless.”).
discussed
Cited "see"
State v. Lunderville
See State v. Sewell, 2009-NMSC-033, ¶ 22 , 18 146 N.M. 428 , 211 P.3d 885 (citing to numerous cases standing for the proposition 19 that officers need not abruptly discontinue an investigation merely because of initial 16 1 unsuccessful results), cert. denied, 2010-NMCERT-001 , 147 N.M. 673 , 227 P.3d 2 1055 .
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
State v. Ramos
The Legislature knows how to include the word “knowingly.” See, e.g., NMSA 1978, § 30-3A-3(A) (2009) (stating that“[s]talking consists of knowingly pursuing a pattern of conduct”); see also State v. Wilson, 2010-NMCA-018, ¶ 12 , 147 N.M. 706 , 228 P.3d 490 (holding that use of the term “knowingly” in NMSA 1978, Section 30-31-20(B), (C) (2006), required specific knowledge that the drug trafficking would occur within a drug-free school zone), cert, denied, 2010-NMCERT-001 , 147 N.M. 673 , 227 P.3d 1055 .
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
State v. Ramos
The Legislature knows how to include the word “knowingly.” See, e.g., NMSA 1978, § 30-3A- 3(A) (2009) (stating that “[s]talking consists of knowingly pursuing a pattern of conduct”); see also State v. Wilson, 2010-NMCA-018, ¶ 12 , 147 N.M. 706 , 228 P.3d 490 (holding that use of the term “knowingly” in NMSA 1978, Section 30-31-20(B), (C) (2006), required specific knowledge that the drug trafficking would occur within a drug-free school zone), cert. denied, 2010-NMCERT-001 , 147 N.M. 673 , 227 P.3d 1055 .
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
State v. Ramos
The Legislature knows how to include the word “knowingly.” See, e.g., NMSA 1978, § 30-3A- 3(A) (2009) (stating that “[s]talking consists of knowingly pursuing a pattern of conduct”); see also State v. Wilson, 2010-NMCA-018, ¶ 12 , 147 N.M. 706 , 228 P.3d 490 (holding that use of the term “knowingly” in NMSA 1978, Section 30-31-20(B), (C) (2006), required specific knowledge that the drug trafficking would occur within a drug-free school zone), cert. denied, 2010-NMCERT-001 , 147 N.M. 673 , 227 P.3d 1055 .
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
State v. Ramos
The Legislature knows how to include the word “knowingly.” See, e.g., NMSA 1978, § 30-3A- 3(A) (2009) (stating that “[s]talking consists of knowingly pursuing a pattern of conduct”); see also State v. Wilson, 2010-NMCA-018, ¶ 12 , 147 N.M. 706 , 228 P.3d 490 (holding that use of the term “knowingly” in NMSA 1978, Section 30-31-20(B), (C) (2006), required specific knowledge that the drug trafficking would occur within a drug-free school zone), cert. denied, 2010-NMCERT-001 , 147 N.M. 673 , 227 P.3d 1055 .
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
State v. Begay
Compare State v. Spillman, 2010-NMCA-019, ¶ 6 , 147 N.M. 676 , 227 P.3d 1058 (filed 2009) (holding that before a defendant could contest the validity of a plea entered in metropolitan court by appealing to district court, he had to first move to set aside his plea in metropolitan court because in an on-the-record appeal to district court, that court is the equivalent of an appellate court), cert. denied, 2010-NMCERT-001 , 147 N.M. 673 , 227 P.3d 1055 , with Gallegos, 2007-NMCA-112, ¶¶ 3-8 , 142 N.M. 447 , 166 P.3d 1101 (conducting an evidentiary hearing in district court to determine the va…
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
SMITH
v.
ENMRSH INC.
v.
ENMRSH INC.
32,083 (COA 28,449).
New Mexico Supreme Court.
Jan 7, 2010.
Published
Denial of Certiorari.