neutral
Cited (no substantive treatment)
0.6 score
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Markwell, in error
v.
Pereles and another, in error
v.
Pereles and another, in error
Wisconsin Supreme Court.
Jan 12, 1897.
For the defendants in error there was a brief by Winkler, Flanders, Smith, Bottum & Vilas.
Pinney.
Published
Pinney, J.
This is a writ of error to reverse an order, made after judgment in a habeas corpus case, denying a motion to modify such judgment. The judgment in that case having been reversed, there is no occasion for further prosecution of this writ, and it is therefore dismissed.
By the Court.— It is so ordered.