green
Positive treatment
2.3 score
Treatment trajectory · 2006 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
2006
2016
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 2 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Wisconsin Department of Revenue v. Menasha Corp.
(2×)
See, e.g., DOR v. River City Refuse Removal, Inc., 2006 WI App 34, ¶¶ 12, 14 , 289 Wis.2d 628 , 712 N.W.2d 351 , review granted, 2006 WI 108 , 292 Wis.2d 409 , 718 N.W.2d 723 (2006); All City Commc'n Co. v. DOR, 2003 WI App 77, ¶¶ 6, 11 , 263 Wis.2d 394 , 661 N.W.2d 845 "). ¶ 52 While we afford the Commission due weight deference on its interpretation of the statute, this case centers on the Commission's interpretation of the regulation or rule, Wis. Admin.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Wisconsin Department of Revenue v. Menasha Corp.
See, e.g., DOR v. River City Refuse Removal, Inc., 2006 WI App 34, ¶¶ 12, 14 , 289 Wis. 2d 628 , 712 N.W.2d 351 , review granted, 2006 WI 108 , 292 Wis. 2d 409 , 718 N.W.2d 723 (No. 2004AP2468); All City Commc'n Co. v. DOR, 2003 WI App 77, ¶¶ 6, 11 , 263 Wis. 2d 394 , 661 N.W.2d 845 . ¶ 30.
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
STATE
v.
GROTH.
v.
GROTH.
2004AP1118-CRNM.
Wisconsin Supreme Court.
Jun 14, 2006.
Published
Petition for review denied.