People v. Flores, 744 N.W.2d 174 (Mich. 2008). · Go Syfert
People v. Flores, 744 N.W.2d 174 (Mich. 2008). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
“when the burden of proof at trial would rest on the nonmoving party, the nonmovant may not rest on mere allegations or denials in the pleadings, but must, by documentary evidence, set forth specific facts showing that there is a genuine issue for trial.”
55 citation events (55 in the last 25 years) across 4 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: Allstate Insurance v. Frankel (mied, 2009-08-28)
Treatment trajectory · 2008 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
2008 2017 2026
Top citers, strongest first. 4 distinct citers. How cited ↗
discussed Cited as authority (quoted) Allstate Insurance v. Frankel
E.D. Mich. · 2009 · quote attribution · 1 verbatim quote · confidence low
healing place
examined Cited as authority (quoted) Ellis v. Kaye-Kibbey
W.D. Mich. · 2008 · quote attribution · 1 verbatim quote · confidence low
when the burden of proof at trial would rest on the nonmoving party, the nonmovant may not rest on mere allegations or denials in the pleadings, but must, by documentary evidence, set forth specific facts showing that there is a genuine issue for trial.
cited Cited "see" Marshall v. Grand Trunk Western Railroad
W.D. Mich. · 2011 · signal: accord · confidence high
Accord ARS, 602 F.Supp.2d at 845 (applying Michigan law) (citing Healing Place, 744 N.W.2d at 177 (citing mich. ct.
discussed Cited "see" Crehan v. Davis
W.D. Mich. · 2010 · signal: accord · confidence high
Accord ARS, 602 F.Supp.2d at 845 (applying Michigan law) (citing Healing Place, 744 N.W.2d at 177 (citing Mich. Ct. R. 2.116(G)(6) and Veenstra v. Washtenaw Country Club, 466 Mich. 155 , 645 N.W.2d 643, 648 (2002))). 8 .
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
PEOPLE of the State of Michigan, Plaintiff-Appellee,
v.
Elvin FLORES, III, Defendant-Appellant.
135445.
Michigan Supreme Court.
Feb 19, 2008.
744 N.W.2d 174

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the October 23, 2007 judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court.