Powell v. Save-a-lot, 774 N.W.2d 327 (Mich. 2009). · Go Syfert
Search
Powell v. Save-a-lot, 774 N.W.2d 327 (Mich. 2009). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
13 citation events (13 in the last 25 years) across 3 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: Horizon Lawn Maintenance, Inc. v. Columbus-Kenworth, Inc. (mied, 2016-05-24)
Top citers, strongest first. 4 distinct citers. How cited ↗
discussed Cited as authority (rule) Horizon Lawn Maintenance, Inc. v. Columbus-Kenworth, Inc.
E.D. Mich. · 2016 · confidence medium
The Michigan Supreme Court disposed of Davis by order (not by a reasoned opinion), and the only reference in the order to attorneys’ fees is the following single sentence: "This order does not affect the trial court’s award of attorney fees.” Id. at 327.
discussed Cited "see" Shaker v. Champion Petfoods USA, Inc.
E.D. Mich. · 2022 · signal: see · confidence high
See Davis v. Forest River, Inc., 774 N.W.2d 327, 328 (Mich. 2009) (applying economic-loss doctrine to consumer’s purchase of a recreational vehicle).
discussed Cited "see" Gant v. Ford Motor Company (2×)
E.D. Mich. · 2021 · signal: see · confidence high
See Davis v. Forest River, Inc., 774 N.W.2d 327 (Mich. 2009).
cited Cited "see" Murphy v. THE PROCTOR & GAMBLE CO.
E.D. Mich. · 2010 · signal: see · confidence high
See Davis v. Forest River, Inc., 485 Mich. 941 , 774 N.W.2d 327 (2009).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Shirley POWELL, Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
SAVE-A-LOT, Defendant-Appellee.
138991.
Michigan Supreme Court.
Nov 6, 2009.
774 N.W.2d 327
Marilyn J. Kelly.
Cited by 2 opinions  |  Published

Order

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the April 21, 2009 judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the question presented should be reviewed by this Court.

MARILYN J. KELLY, C.J., would grant leave to appeal.

MARKMAN, J. (dissenting).

I would grant leave to appeal to address inconsistent approaches in Michigan case-law concerning the treatment of so-called "black ice" cases. This is a matter that warrants the clear direction of the highest court of this State (latitude 41.9N°-48.0N°).