People v. Oskroba, 112 N.E.2d 778 (NY 1953). · Go Syfert
Search
People v. Oskroba, 112 N.E.2d 778 (NY 1953). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
16 citation events (5 in the last 25 years) across 6 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: People v. Stachnik (nyappdiv, 2012-12-21)
Top citers, strongest first. 5 distinct citers. How cited ↗
discussed Cited "see" People v. Stachnik
N.Y. App. Div. · 2012 · signal: see · confidence high
Defendant failed to preserve that contention for our review (see Gianni, 94 AD3d at 1477 ; see also People v Randall, 48 AD3d 1080, 1080 [2008]; see generally People v Ebert, 18 AD3d 963, 964 [2005]), and in any event defendant’s contention is without merit (see generally People v Oskroba, 305 NY 113, 117 [1953], rearg denied 305 NY 696 [1953]; People v Matos, 28 AD3d 1120, 1121-1122 [2006]).
discussed Cited "see" STACHNIK, STANLEY, PEOPLE v
N.Y. App. Div. · 2012 · signal: see · confidence high
Defendant failed to preserve that contention for our review (see Gianni, 94 AD3d at 1477 ; see also People v Randall, 48 AD3d 1080, 1080 ; see generally People v Ebert, 18 AD3d 963, 964 ), and in any event defendant’s contention is without merit (see generally People v Oskroba, 305 NY 113, 117 , rearg denied 305 NY 696 ; People v Matos, 28 AD3d 1120 , 1121- 1122).
discussed Cited "see" People v. Stachnik
N.Y. App. Div. · 2012 · signal: see · confidence high
Defendant failed to preserve that contention for our review (see Gianni, 94 AD3d at 1477 ; see also People v Randall, 48 AD3d 1080, 1080 [2008]; see generally People v Ebert, 18 AD3d 963, 964 [2005]), and in any event defendant’s contention is without merit (see generally People v Oskroba, 305 NY 113, 117 [1953], rearg denied 305 NY 696 [1953]; People v Matos, 28 AD3d 1120, 1121-1122 [2006]).
cited Cited "see" United States Ex Rel. Spero v. Wenzel
E.D.N.Y · 1975 · signal: see · confidence high
See People v. Oskroba, 305 N.Y. 113 , 111 N.E.2d 235 , reargument denied 305 N.Y. 696 , 112 N.E.2d 778 (1953).
discussed Cited "see, e.g." People v. Marcellus L. (2×)
Cal. Ct. App. · 1991 · signal: see also · confidence low
It is not a right.” ( 383 N.Y.S.2d at p. 853 ; see also People v. Oskroba (1953) 305 N.Y. 696 [ 112 N.E.2d 778 ].) But whether a minor may or may not refuse probation is not the determinative factor here.
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
The People of the State of New York, Respondent,
v.
Alphonse J. Oskroba, Appellant.
New York Court of Appeals.
Apr 16, 1953.
112 N.E.2d 778
Cited by 5 opinions  |  Published

Motion for reargument denied. [See 305 N.Y. 113.]