Simpson v. Loehmann, 239 N.E.2d 205 (NY 1968). · Go Syfert
Search
Simpson v. Loehmann, 239 N.E.2d 205 (NY 1968). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
9 citation events (2 in the last 25 years) across 3 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: A. Conner General Contracting Inc. v. Rols Capital Co. (nyappdiv, 1988-12-12)
Top citers, strongest first. 1 distinct citer. How cited ↗
discussed Cited "see, e.g." A. Conner General Contracting Inc. v. Rols Capital Co.
N.Y. App. Div. · 1988 · signal: see also · confidence low
However, New York’s present choice-of-law rule, dubbed the center of gravity approach (see, Auten v Auten, 308 NY 155, 160 ; see also, Intercontinental Planning v Daystrom, Inc., 24 NY2d 372 ) is that the law of the State having the most significant contacts with the matter in dispute will be applied (see, Miller v Miller, 22 NY2d 12 , mot to amend remittitur denied 22 NY2d 722 ), even where the matter in dispute is usury (see, Tuthill Fin. v Cartaya, 133 AD2d 343 ; Pioneer Credit Corp. v Catalano, 51 Misc 2d 407 , affd 28 AD2d 595 ).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
William Simpson, as Father and Natural Guardian of Michael Simpson, an Infant
v.
Fred Loehmann
New York Court of Appeals.
May 29, 1968.
239 N.E.2d 205
Published

Motion for a stay pending appeal to the Supreme Court of the United States granted upon condition that such an appeal is taken by defendant on or before June 10, 1968. [See 21 N Y 2d 305, 990.]