VILL. OF CROTON-ON-HUDSON v. Cnty. of Westchester, 30 N.Y.2d 959 (NY 1972). · Go Syfert
Search
VILL. OF CROTON-ON-HUDSON v. Cnty. of Westchester, 30 N.Y.2d 959 (NY 1972). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
11 citation events (3 in the last 25 years) across 5 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: 61 Crown St., LLC v. City of Kingston Common Council (nyappdiv, 2022-06-16)
Top citers, strongest first. 1 distinct citer. How cited ↗
discussed Cited "see, e.g." 61 Crown St., LLC v. City of Kingston Common Council
N.Y. App. Div. · 2022 · signal: compare · confidence low
Further, the fact that there is a concrete patio, a few movable picnic tables, a planter and some painted hop-scotch boards does not nearly establish the municipality's unmistakable intent to permanently dedicate public land for use as a park ( see Matter of Glick v Harvey , 25 NY3d at 1180-1181 ; compare Village of Croton-On-Hudson v County of Westchester , 38 AD2d 979, 980 [1972], affd 30 NY2d 959 [1972]).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Village of Croton-On-Hudson, Respondent,
v.
County of Westchester, Appellant.
New York Court of Appeals.
Jul 6, 1972.
30 N.Y.2d 959
Published

John J. S. Mead, County Attorney, for appellant.

Seymour M. Waldman and Louis Waldman for respondent.

Concur: Chief Judge FULD and Judges BURKE, SCILEPPI, BERGAN, BREITEL, JASEN and GIBSON.

Order affirmed, without costs. Question certified answered in the affirmative. No opinion.